u/Background_Muffin514

​

Hey everyone,

I’m 35, and I’m bored of the usual networking or standard hangs. I’m going out for a nice dinner this week, and I want to invite someone to join.

You won’t pay a single Dirham for the food. But here is the catch: You have to pay your share in "value".

Before the night ends, you have to either:

Tell me a fascinating, true story from your life that I’ve never heard before.

Teach me a cool mini-skill or share a unique piece of knowledge (could be about tech, art, history, psychology, or even a magic trick).

Any gender is welcome. I’m just looking for a cool human being who brings good energy to the table.

If you’re up for this exchange, DM me with a 1-sentence teaser of the story or skill you’ll bring to the table

Hey everyone,I’ve noticed a very weird trend on this sub (and Reddit in general). Someone makes a post to share an announcement, ask a specific question, or look for something very particular. They are NOT asking for life advice, moral policing, or anyone's personal opinion on their choices.Yet, the comments get flooded with people giving their uninvited, unsolicited opinions, judging the OP, and acting like self-appointed life coaches.Why do you think some people here have this intense urge to project their personal views onto situations that don't involve them? Is it a need for attention? A lack of boundaries? Or just pure boredom?I’d love to understand the psychology behind this need to comment just for the sake of sharing an opinion nobody asked for. Lets talk.

السلام عليكم

لاحظت واحد الحاجة كتعاود بزاف هنا وفي بزاف ديال المجموعات، وهي فاش شي حد كيدير منشور باغي يتعرف (Dating post) بطريقة محترمة وواضحة، بزاف ديال الناس كيهجموا عليه بتقنيات العار" والاستهزاء في التعليقات.

علاش هاد الهجوم؟ الشخص كيكون واضح في الأهداف ديالو باغي يخرج باغي يتعرف، أو حتى باغي يتكفل بالمصاريف ... إذا ما عجبكش العرض أو ما كنتيش أنت الفئة المستهدفة علاش ما تمرش مرور الكرام؟

واش التعارف ولا طابو" لهاد الدرجة حتى وحنا فمنصة بحال ريديت اللي من المفترض أنها منفتحة ؟ ولا المشكل في الطريقة باش كيتطرح الموضوع ؟

بغيت نعرف وجهة النظر ديالكم بكل احترام واش كتشوفوا أن هاد المنشورات فعلاً كتستاهل داك الهجوم، ولا خاصنا شوية ديال عيش وخلي ناس تعيش

Bonjour à toutes

Homme de 35 ans, je suis à la recherche d'une personne agréable pour m'accompagner lors de mes prochaines sorties (restaurants, cafés, .cinémas ou événements culturels)

Je cherche avant tout une belle rencontre, basée sur le respect et la bonne humeur. Pour que nous puissions profiter pleinement du moment, je précise que toutes les invitations sont pour moi: vous n'aurez rien à débourser dans les lieux que nous visiterons.

Si vous avez envie de partager un bon moment et de faire connaissance, n'hésitez pas à m'envoyer un message privé (DM) avec une petite présentation.

Au plaisir de vous lire!

I just finished the final season of YOU, and I can’t help but feel that the writers completely missed the mark. It wasn't about the ending itself, but rather the execution and the blatant "agendas" that took priority over consistent storytelling.

Here is why I think the writing failed this season:

1. The "Woke" Agenda overshadowed the Plot

The season felt more like a social lecture than a psychological thriller. Instead of the nuanced, complex "Anti-Hero" we’ve followed for years, the writers turned the show into a platform for "preachy" dialogue. The focus shifted from Joe’s internal struggle to a forced "sisterhood" narrative that felt disconnected from the show's original DNA.

2. Stripping Joe of his Agency

In previous seasons, Joe was a genius—flawed and evil, yes, but brilliant. In Season 5, they sidelined the main character in his own show. He became a tool to highlight the "heroism" of the female characters. It felt like the writers were "jealous" of Joe’s popularity and decided to humiliate him rather than give him a compelling downfall.

3. The Hypocrisy regarding "Masculinity"

There’s a specific scene where Joe is told not to cry during an interview so the audience will like him. This is peak irony. The show claims to fight "toxic masculinity," yet the female characters (like Kate) are the ones enforcing these rigid, "anti-emotion" roles on him. They treated his vulnerability as an "annoying feminine trait" rather than a human emotion.

4. Erasing the "Victim" Backstory

When the characters tell Joe "You are not a victim," the writers are essentially erasing 4 seasons of psychological depth. Joe’s trauma and his childhood are facts of his character. Denying them doesn't make him a better villain; it just makes the writing flat and biased. You can be a victim of your past and a monster in the present at the same time—that’s what made the show great.

Conclusion:

I don’t mind Joe going to prison. I don't mind him losing. But I mind when the "message" becomes more important than the character. The writing felt biased, forced, and ultimately took the spotlight away from the very person we’ve been watching for years. It felt like an "identity politics" makeover for a show that was originally about the dark corners of the human mind.

Does anyone else feel like the writers sacrificed the story for the sake of being "politically correct"?