u/BetterScienceBlog

A former NSF Program Director admits he was recruited to “prevent the dissemination to the wrong people, prematurely, when it could cause enormous damage” (10:17).

He also admits to other currently suppressed clean energy technology (57:11).

Full article and interview here: https://betterscience.substack.com/p/former-nsf-program-director-blows

>Einstein claimed in an interview to have no knowledge of Michelson-Morley prior to 1905: “When I asked him [Einstein] how he had learned of the Michelson-Morley experiment, he told me that he had become aware of it through the writings of H. A. Lorentz, but only after 1905 had it come to his attention! ‘Otherwise,’ he said, ‘I would have mentioned it in my paper’ ”[7].

Yet

>Einstein wrote to his wife Mileva in December 1901: “I want to get down to business now and read what Lorentz and Drude have written about electrodynamics of moving bodies” [9]. Hector Munera explains the importance of this admission as follows: “these books were the 1895 theory of Lorentz, and the 1900 optics book by Drude. The empirical basis for Lorentz’ work was the “negative” interpretation of the MM experiment. Indeed, Lorentz was closely following Michelson’s work right from the beginning and send him a correction to the 1881 experiment” [9]

Sources:

[7] Shankland R.S. . “Conversations with Albert Einstein”, Am. J. Phys. 31 (1) 47-57 (1963). Quoted in Munera, H. “Observation During 2004 of Periodic Fringe-Shifts in an Adialeiptometric Stationary Michelson-Morley Experiment”. Electromagnetic Phenomena. 2006;6(1):70-92.

[9] J. Renn and R. Schulmann (editors), S. Smith (translator), Albert Einstein-Mileva Maric, The Love Letters, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992) 107 pp. Quoted in Munera, H. “Observation During 2004 of Periodic Fringe-Shifts in an Adialeiptometric Stationary Michelson-Morley Experiment”. Electromagnetic Phenomena. 2006;6(1):70-92.

Through lies of omission and commission, it appears that Einstein mislead the public about his famous theory.