Pet insurance is "gambling"?
I'm realising that scholars have taken the notion of what is "gambling" literally too far.
The abstraction that any transaction where money changes hands based on an unknown future outcome might not be the essence of the "gambling" that is prohibited in the Quran.
The most common-senae understanding of the prohibition of gambling would imply a prohibition on the specific detrimental activity that involves the thrill of making money based on an unknown future outcome that can equally end in loss, and it is addictive and ruinous for that very reason. Any extrapolation or abstraction of gambling away from that specific kind of addictive and ruinous activity is irrational.
And it is equally absurd that people who end up ruining their and others' lives doing day-trading in halal stocks are completely fine from a religious perspective whereas those who buy pet insurance because the cost of veterinary care is exorbitant are somehow invovled in gambling.
What do the people here think about pet insurance and "gambling"?