u/BobLargo

Fun With Census #s: Ranking Cities By Population Growth Per Square Mile
▲ 17 r/USCensus2020+1 crossposts

Fun With Census #s: Ranking Cities By Population Growth Per Square Mile

There are lots of problems with looking at census data on a city limits basis (which is how the census presents it). One issue is that cities have arbitrary municipal limits; for example, San Francisco is only ~46 square miles whereas Jacksonville, FL is ~747 square miles. Comparing such wildly different land areas is obviously difficult.

So I had some fun with the Census population estimates, and took the 50 cities with the largest absolute two-year population increase, and then divided that increase by the square miles within the city limits (using the land area, i.e., excluding square miles covered by water).

Why did I use two-year data? Because one-year data is way too noisy (especially with Census estimates), and going back beyond two years relates back to the COVID-era population losses. I'm mostly interested in how cities are growing in the post-COVID era.

The results (again, looking at only the cities within the top 50 absolute largest growers) are as follows:

  1. Newark
  2. NYC
  3. Seattle
  4. McKinney, Texas (Dallas Suburb)
  5. Miami
  6. New Braunfels, Texas (San Antonio Suburb)
  7. San Francisco
  8. Washington DC
  9. Port St Lucie, FL
  10. Charlotte

Take away from this what you will.

I should note that the picture is much different if you go back 5 years to 2020. Although NYC/SF are rebounding, they're still below their pre-COVID populations (i.e., they have a net population loss since 2020).

p.s. A note on %s (since some people complain about using absolute population changes vs % changes): If I used percentages, this would generate nothing but small cities no one has ever heard of (I think "Buckeye City" jumps to #1). Absolutes are, of course, not perfect. But neither are percentages. Are we really going to put more weight on a few thousand people moving to Buckeye City than 150k moving to NYC in two years just because Buckeye City's % is better?

Edit: Source Census for population changes can be found here: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-national-detail.html#v2025

u/BobLargo — 4 days ago

New York was the fastest growing city in the country over the last 24 months…

What does Reddit not see in that town?

In all seriousness, I took the exact same census data from the Charlotte post, and sorted it by the two-year population change instead of the one year change.

Results (ordered by largest 2-year population gain):

  1. NY

  2. Houston

  3. Charlotte

  4. Fort Worth

  5. San Antonio

  6. Chicago

  7. Seattle

  8. Nashville

  9. Jacksonville

  10. LA

Edit: My reason for posting is merely to show that people shouldn’t draw conclusions from one year of data. The comments in the Charlotte thread (based off one-year estimates) were largely people arguing that people don’t actually want large, walkable cities like NY/Chicago. A different perspective of the same data demonstrates those reactions were overblown.

reddit.com
u/BobLargo — 6 days ago