Shouldn't EasyPrint be AGPL?
edit: My question has been solved folks, thanks very much. Apparently the original blog post on easyprint, which I hadn't found for some reason, stated clearly that the prusaslicer software easyprint runs is the exact same released on github, so no AGPL violation here.
Please, could anyone from Prusa answer this?
Since Easyprint used Prusaslicer on the backend, shouldn't it be licensed as AGPL? Isn't this explicitly one of the differences between AGPL and GPL, that it enforces the copyleft in cases similar to this?
So were can one find the source code running on easyprint?
I am just asking because the recent violations of the AGPL by Bambu Labs have started to worry me on how much 3d printing companies care about open source licensing(Bambu certainly does not care), and since Prusa has always promoted FOSS it surprises me that the code for easyprint isn't available.