u/BraveSwinger

I just got a reply from Serica support claiming that they absolutely refuse to let me know when my watch was made unless I know who the original buyer was.

So, careful when buying used!

The Serica 6190 absolutely feels like it’s worth the asking price. In terms of case finishing, polishing, crystal quality, and overall detailing, it doesn’t lag behind brands like Omega or modern IWC (maybe excluding the ultra‑high‑end pieces). The watch feels thin, well‑proportioned, and thoughtfully designed.

Build & Finishing

- The case finishing is genuinely impressive for the price bracket.

- Crystal and dial execution are clean and refined.

- Overall wrist presence is sharp and significant.

Bracelet (the weak point)

The stock bracelet is the one real disappointment. If you wear it slightly loose, it tends to pop open on its own. It looks good, but the clasp behavior makes it hard to trust.

Comparisons with the watches I owned:

- Versus Sinn 556: the Serica feels a step above in almost everything except the bracelet and the crystal.

- Versus 90s Omega Speedmaster (in name only) 166.0285: similar vibe and build quality, but the Serica has better specs and a more modern execution. The Omega bracelet is a lot better.

- Versus Lorier or modern Smiths: Serica is two steps higher in refinement, finishing, and overall feel.

Movement Behavior

This part might be individual to my piece, but worth mentioning:

- Accuracy is excellent.

- However, the rotor seems to wind the movement a bit reluctantly — the real‑world power reserve is under 24 hours unless you wear it from morning to night. (This reminds me of the same quirk my ETA 2892 Speedmaster has.)

- The rotor is noticeably loud, and the sound is particularly unpleasant.

- On the positive side: manual winding is smooth, crisp, and satisfying, and setting the time feels extremely precise.

---

Verdict

The Serica 6190 is a beautifully executed, thoughtfully designed watch that punches above its weight in finishing and overall quality. The bracelet and movement quirks hold it back from perfection, but if you value case/dial execution and vintage‑tool aesthetics, it’s a standout in its price range.

Hi everyone! I recently bought a used transitional (no quick adjust) Lorier Falcon III.

The watch is a clever homage to so many icons, and I hope it will find its place among the wider audience.

But having only seen it online before buying, I now noticed two things that keep me (mildly) dissatisfied.

1. The transition between the lugs and the bezel is like this: round bezel into a roughly octagonal shape at its base and later into the lugs. This leaves small areas that catch light in a displeasing manner.

2. The dial looks too small. There's a lot of distortion cased by the crystal, then there's some free space (visually), then there's the minute track. It leaves me with an impression that the dial is from a 32-34mm watch instead of a 36mm one. It might be a homage to Rolex Bubble Back, but it just doesn't look modern or practical.

Bonus:

3. The hands are a bit too flat. Should either be faceted (like Ulysse Nardin Big Crown) or have a slightly larger lume triangle on the hour hand (Ranchero, Railmaster) and a slightly different shape.

4. I don't understand the Speedmaster type seconds hand. Why not lollipop?

5. The lugs are too long. I guess 2-4mm of l2l could be shaved off.

I hope no one feels offended. I only wanted to provide direct and helpful critique.