u/BreadfruitOld6041

▲ 0 r/VideoEditingRequests+1 crossposts

I'll make you any video for free (~1minute duration.)

I built my own video generation/editing workflow, and I’m looking for some real-world projects to test it on.

Send me your source material and tell me what you want — I’ll make the video for free.

The more detailed you can be about your concept, scene composition, camera angles, pacing, references, or specific shots you want, the better.

And feel free to ask for edits until it fits what you had in mind.

I’m mainly doing this to test how well my workflow handles actual creative requests, so detailed or challenging ideas are very welcome.

Drop your idea below or DM me!

reddit.com
u/BreadfruitOld6041 — 10 days ago

AI made video ad production faster, but revision requests became the real bottleneck. I built an internal tool for our agency.

I work at an advertising agency, and I’ve been building an internal side project to solve a workflow problem we kept running into.

AI has made it much faster to create video ad assets.

But for us, the real bottleneck wasn’t the first draft.

It was the endless small revision requests after that.

Things like:

- change this subtitle

- swap this clip

- adjust the text position

- make a new variation with a different person

- reuse the same structure but change the dialogue

- make this version for another campaign

- tweak the design without changing the original

- generate another cut, but keep the style consistent

Every time these requests came in, we were often repeating the same work manually.

And because the assets were scattered across uploads, generated images, generated videos, edited versions, final composites, and campaign folders, it became hard to keep quality consistent.

The problem wasn’t just “generate more videos with AI.”

It was:

- keeping track of source assets and edited versions

- making small changes without rebuilding everything

- preserving the master creative

- generating controlled variations

- letting marketers/account managers request changes without breaking the editor’s workflow

- maintaining consistent quality across many versions

So I built an internal web app for our agency around that workflow.

The main features:

- client / campaign / creative asset management

- AI-assisted image and video generation

- a visual node canvas for tracking asset lineage

- an explorer view for generated assets, uploads, drafts, edits, and final composites

- a browser-based video editor with subtitles, layers, text, shapes, and timeline editing

- edit drafts and checkpoint history

- campaign forking for controlled variations

- favorites / asset library for reusing winning creatives across campaigns

I’m still thinking through whether this could become a real product outside our agency.

One challenge is pricing.

Since image/video generation and rendering depend on external AI APIs and compute, it probably can’t be a simple cheap flat plan like “$29/month.”

It would likely need to be usage-based, where teams pay based on how much generation/rendering they actually use.

Because of that, I’m guessing this would be more useful for agencies, in-house marketing teams, or creative ops teams than solo creators.

Curious:

- Do other agencies or performance marketing teams struggle more with revisions than first drafts?

- How do you currently manage small creative changes across many video ad variations?

- Is creative lineage/versioning a real pain point, or do you just handle it with Drive/Notion/Sheets/Frame.io?

- Would usage-based pricing make sense for this kind of workflow tool?

- Who usually owns this workflow in your team: marketers, account managers, creative producers, or video editors?

Not trying to hard-sell anything. I’m mostly trying to understand if this pain exists outside our agency too.

reddit.com
u/BreadfruitOld6041 — 4 months ago