What seems to matter more for acute anxiety: slower breathing or breath ratio?
I found this study interesting because it looks at a very practical question: when people use slow diaphragmatic breathing for anxiety, what matters more, breathing slower or tweaking the inhale/exhale ratio? In this 2024 study, 828 participants completed a single 10-minute guided breathing session online. Breathing rate was varied between 6 and 12 breaths per minute, while inhale/exhale ratios were also systematically adjusted. The main finding was that slower breathing rates were associated with lower post-exercise anxiety, while the inhale/exhale ratio did not show a significant relationship with anxiety outcomes. That seems useful because it points toward a simpler takeaway: if the goal is acute anxiety reduction, slowing down may matter more than fine-tuning the ratio. Of course, this was a one-session study, so it says more about immediate effects than long-term practice. Curious whether people here find that intuitive, or whether you expected the inhale/exhale ratio to matter more. Source: Czub M, Kowal M, Esteve Zarazaga R, Serrano-Ibáñez ER, Ruíz-Párraga GT, Ramírez-Maestre C, López-Martínez AE, Paccione C, Piskorz J (2024). A slow diaphragmatic breathing intervention for anxiety: How do respiration rate and inhalation/exhalation ratio influence self-reported anxiety? Stress and Health, 40(6), e3496. DOI: 10.1002/smi.3496 Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3496