Login

u/BronkLikesReps

Image 1 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 2 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 3 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 4 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 5 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 6 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 7 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 8 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 9 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 10 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
Image 11 — Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont
▲ 5 r/RepTimeQC

Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar - QF - Hont

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: QF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II Polar 226570
  4. Price Paid: $428 shipped
  5. Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/A202512172356311672002881?filterText=734065
  6. Index alignment: Hard to tell. Every picture is at an angle. I made two alignments seen at the end with picture 9 and 8. Seems like the 12 o'clock and 9 o'clock aren't aligned, but it might be an optical illusion. I’m leaning towards “it’s fine”.
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good, centered
  9. Hand Alignment: Stacked correctly, lengths look right
  10. Bezel: Seems perfect
  11. Solid End Links (SELs):  Hard to tell with the plastic, seems acceptable
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 262°, 0.1ms
  13. Anything else you notice: Hont pictures give a bit to be desired, but for the price I can’t really complain. Rehaut in the video looks good. Overall, I like this example, I’m just hoping I’m not missing something obvious. Plan to GL.

 

u/BronkLikesReps — 3 days ago