u/Bubbly_Machine_8378

Image 1 — Overclocking a GPU at 8K (7680x4320) resolution gives insane performance gains
Image 2 — Overclocking a GPU at 8K (7680x4320) resolution gives insane performance gains
Image 3 — Overclocking a GPU at 8K (7680x4320) resolution gives insane performance gains

Overclocking a GPU at 8K (7680x4320) resolution gives insane performance gains

*Yes it’s a 14 year old game. Still 8K is a lot of pixels*. This was just for science, or you can say just for fun purposes.

Vbios flashed RTX 3060 TI with custom fans. I know its an ‘old piece of trash’ but I still love this card

I know higher resolutions have a lot more pixel data to be processed, but wow memory overclock beats Core overclock??

16% increase when combing core + memory overclock? That’s roughly a generational performance uplift nowadays lol

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 11 days ago
▲ 582 r/PcBuild

Why do people say my PC is ‘bottlenecked’ ??

Ryzen 9600X 5.6 GHz
32 GB DDR5 6200 MT/s 26-35-30-64
Gigabyte X870 Eagle Wifi 7
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Samsung PM991 512 GB
SATA 512 GB

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 1 month ago

Ryzen 5 9600X 5th place 3DMark Time Spy | 12,510 CPU score

My 5th place CPU physics score of 12,510 on my Ryzen 9600X CPU

CPU was manually overclocked to 5.55 GHz All-core at 1.38v. PBO scores worse than Manual PC

DDR5 was heavily tuned at 6200 MT/s 28-36-34-40 1.5v in 1:1 mode with GDM disabled and 2167 MHz Infinity Fabric

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 2 months ago

Making my Ryzen 9600X better since elitists think its “Ewaste” because their 9850X3D is better

Making the “trash” 9600X Ryzen 5 processor less “trash”.

Memory tuning and PBO negative 30 curve optimizer. Now it should run 5.6+ GHz in single core performance

DDR5 6200 28-36-34-40 1.5v VDD and 1.284v SOC

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 3 months ago

Is running faster DDR5/UCLK on Ryzen meaningful if Infinity Fabric is a ‘bottleneck’ ?

(Please correct me if anything sounds incorrect)

I tested DDR5 6200 with 2000 FCLK and 2167 FCLK running TM5 stress test. HWInfo reported
Dram Read bandwidth around 62-63 GB/s with 2000 FCLK, and 67-69 GB/s with 2167 FCLK.

Write bandwidth didn’t increase as much, it went from maximum of like 30 GB/s to max 32 GB/s.

DDR5 6200 should have a maximum theoretical bandwidth (i know its theoretical) of around 99 GB/s, and i’d assume during a heavy stress test maxing out the CPU and Ram, probably above 70-80+ GB/s for read bandwidth.

reddit.com
u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 3 months ago

DDR5 6000 FCLK 2200 vs 6200 FCLK 2067 | Which do yall think is faster?

Would DDR5 6000 FCLK 2200 beat 6200 FCLK 2067?

I know FCLK 2200 MHz is not recommended but in theory, i was just curious to know what you guys think

I also know a 6200 setup is not directly comparable to a 6000 setup.

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 3 months ago

Ryzen 9600X | increasing to FCLK 2200 got me 12th place in Time Spy CPU score (12,434 points)

GPU score is low because i under clocked it. I’m mainly focusing on CPU score.

32 GB Dual-Rank DDR5 6000 28-36-32-38 1.45v

CPU manually OC to 5550 MHz 1.35v with medium LLC

PBO actually seems to score a little lower even with 10x scalar, -30 Curve optimizer, manual PBO limits

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 3 months ago

Boiling hot take: 2.5 hours of TM5 Extreme is good enough for me

Go ahead, rip me apart for not running 24-48 hour long stress tests for 4 days straight.

RAM temps at worst go a little above 40c in stress tests. Generally below 40c when gaming.

TM5 errors every time when attempting to run 6200, even at 1.275 VSOC. 6000 runs smooth every time.

Some of these could probably be optimized further but idk.

I set tFAW at 24 because of the rule tFAW must be 4x tRRDS. So i guess tRRDS 6 and tFAW 24 fits that rule 🤷🏾‍♂️

“Why is ur FCLK so high” because i’m dumb and want to run high FCLK. Haven’t noticed any stutters/audio cuts yet and Time Spy seems to score a little better with higher FCLK

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 3 months ago

3DMark Steel Nomad | My overclocked 3060TI score compared to graphics cards running at ‘advertised’ clocks

My overclocked RTX 3060 TI compared to other graphics cards running at stock speeds.

Funny thing is my OC score is still power limited

Stock 3060 TI at 1665 MHz is around 26.77 fps

Mine overclocked +235 core and +1500 Mem is 30.28 fps

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 4 months ago

Ryzen 9600X CPU Time Spy score 12,289 | 5575 MHz OC + DDR5 6200 28-35-32-48

Ryzen 9600X Time Spy CPU score: 12,289 points
Overclocked CPU to 5575 MHz 1.335v.
DDR5 6200 28-35-32-48 1.45v

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 4 months ago

Ryzen 5 9600X | DDR5 6000 CL30 vs 6200 CL26 Time Spy

6000 30-40-40-40-76: 11,551 points
6200 26-20-35-32-48: 12,237 points
Dual-Rank Hynix O-die memory from Patriot

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 4 months ago

If I used a 360 AIO, I might run 1.4v+ on my 9600X??

I want to hit 5.6 GHz all core in every single task. If I can do that, I wanna try 5.65 GHz for a 200+ MHz OC above advertised spec.

Unless my motherboard is just garbage. Load Line calibration is set to high.

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

RTX 3060 TI and Ryzen 9600X timespy score 12,806 (holy GPU bottleneck)

I forgot what OC I was running on both.

I’ve tested since this and was able to break 13K on my OC 3060TI.

But I definitely think there’s room for improvement on both CPU and Graphics scores.

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

Yo PC nerds, is 1.4v Vcore ‘safe’ for a 9600X. I want to attempt a locked 5600 or 5650 MHz in gaming.

My cooler is a Thermalright Phantom spirit 120 Evo. Not the greatest but temps don’t seem high despite when loading menus spike up to 120+ watts 80c temp in short bursts.

reddit.com
u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

Is DDR5 6200 MT/s CL28 & FCLK 2067 MHz the “sweet spot” for AM5 gaming?

DDR5 Dual-Rank Hynix O-die
6200 MT/s 28-30-35-32-48

FCLK 2066.67 MHz

I think this is the “sweet spot” for non-EXPO systems.

Sometimes I wish I had a GPU powerful enough that would let me stress my CPU/RAM a bit more.

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

Ryzen 5 9600X 5.6 GHz all core

My 9600X barely handles a locked 5.6 GHz all core at 1.35v, sometimes with occasional crashing. Any 9600X owners with better OC results?

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

DDR5 6200 28-30-35-32-48 Hynix O-die setup

I know this is weak in the RAM overclocking world, but I still like this as a daily runner setup. Temps are pretty good as well.

idk why FGR mode is forced. I tried nearly everything but it stays in FGR.

TRCDWR can go lower but I just settled at 30 for best compatibility. Some of the other timings could possibly be tuned as well but I don't think it's worth the troubleshooting.

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago

3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score 3,028 points | RTX 3060 TI and Ryzen 5 9600X

Overclocked my 3060 TI in a few runs of Steel Nomad. Got 3,028 points which I believe is roughly on par with a stock 4060 TI and 5060; just a few % off a stock 3070.

I just did +235 Core and +1600 Memory in MSI afterburner. nothing crazy ofc.

PC specs: Ryzen 5 9600X (PBO) | 32 GB DDR5 tuned at 6200 MT/s CL28 1.45v | X870 Gigabyte Eagle Wifi 7 Motherboard | Samsung PM991 NVME SSD

u/Bubbly_Machine_8378 — 5 months ago