
u/CDpov

ESPN Article: Will the 2026 Rodgers/McCarthy offense be better than the 2025 Rodgers/Tomlin offense?
Ben Solak: "I took a look at exactly how the Steelers' offense was built in 2025 and how much of that construction was because of Rodgers' play at his age. I also tried to size up what McCarthy could do to work around Rodgers' play style in 2026 and how successful the Steelers could be if he pulls it off."
His conclusion: "So will the Steelers be any better this season? Never say never, of course. I watched them start 11-0 with the husk of Ben Roethlisberger in 2020. Rodgers can certainly do this season what Roethlisberger did then. But I'll be placing my eggs in other baskets for 2026."
Tesla robotaxi rollout in Texas features long wait times
The Robotaxi operation in Texas is all about driverless demo rides and safety-driver training.
It's not scaled enough even in Austin to be a serious driverless service.
Nvidia has a similar dominance of AI hardware that Intel had in the CPUs of the PC era
- The AV problem for Nvidia is the big AV companies like Waymo, Tesla, Zoox, Mobileye all own their own technology stack instead of using the Nvidia self-driving stack
- None of these frontier AV companies have substantially used Nvidia chips
- The frontier AV companies utilize a co-design loop of sensors, compute, and software that are all designed together
- The chips shape the models, the models shape the chip, the sensors constrain both
- Designing all three together, quickly learning and deploying improvements in each component is the key to success. Co-design permits a faster and more efficient, thus cheaper system than an off-the-shelf system like Nvidia
- Waymo has apparently always used its own in-house stack, because the hardware-software design loop was too important to leave to an outside supplier
- Cruise head of hardware once said that Nvidia's pricing was unsustainable, so they developed their own chips.
- Aurora is the only frontier American AV company that uses the Nvidia chips
- Aurora has a different strategy because they will deploy their Aurora Driver across OEM trucks it doesn't control and can't customize
- Aurora has committed to DRIVE Thor, as have BYD, Hyper, XPENG, Nuro, Waabi, WeRide, and others
Nvidia DRIVE Orin:
- an ASIL-D certified ADAS SoC, optimized for inference in a car, with a GPU, inference accelerator, and image signal processor to parse sensor output in real time
- 254 TOPS
- a moat for Nvidia is the ASIL-D certification, required for automotive safety-critical systems in the U.S.
- Nvidia DRIVE Sim: a simulation environment for autonomous systems.
- Nvidia Drive OS: the software layer for DRIVE Orin
- Nvidia Hyperion: a reference architecture to help auto companies on how to build a production system around Orin
- Between 2022 and 2025 DRIVE Orin became the dominant ADAS AI chip in China, with over ten Chinese OEMs shipping consumer vehicle using Orin
- BYD shipped over one million vehicle with Orin by 2025
- NIO, XPeng, Li Auto, Zeekr, Xiaomi all use Orin
- NIO has spent over $140 million and four years to develop its own chip, and now saves $1420 per vehicle, with more control over its supply
- Chinese OEM are increasingly moving away from Nvidia chips, pushed by the Chinese government
Author's Conclusion:
- NVIDIA seems safe with DRIVE Thor, for so long as no Western OEM reaches the volume threshold that would make going in-house compelling.
- Nvidia is a supplier of silicon infrastructure to companies that don't need to own the whole stack, mostly for ADAS.
- Evidence suggests that Nvidia can't become the foundational platform for full-autonomy companies.
Not mentioned in the article:
- Mercedes is using Nvidia chips and the Alpamayo models for their AV future.
- Companies using Thor include: May Mobility, Wayve, Waabi, WeRide, Nissan, Hyundai, Geely, Lucid, and Uber has a partnership with Nvidia
- Rivian used Orin Drive in the R1 but is developing its own RAP1 chips in the R2.