Bigger isn't better
I see so many people who assume the bigger the house the better. It's not always the case. I lived in a 4500 sq ft home for many years. Never used 1/2 the sq footage. But I paid to heat, cool and clean it.
Downsized to a 1900 sq ft house, and it's perfect.
Obviously I'm not saying don't buy a big house. If that's what you want, awesome. Just saying, think about what you need and chances are the 2000 sq version will work as well for you as the 4000 sq version.
Thank you for attending my Ted Talk.
Edit: Lots of comments to the tune of "we need all the rooms". I missed a part of my original post I guess. The number of rooms we moved from didn't really change. We went from 5 bedrooms to 4 bedrooms and an office (5th bedroom sort of but it doesn't have a closet so legally it can't be called a bedroom). Went from 3.5 bathrooms to 2.5. The difference is all the rooms are smaller. The master bedroom is probably 1/3 the size, but the old one was enormous. The new one is perfectly fine. The old one had a laundry room the size of some small NYC apartments LOL. The new one is big enough for a washer and dryer and some shelves. Things like that. I liken it to instead of getting the XL meal, we got the medium size. We still left the restaurant full, we just didn't over eat.
Also addressing money. The move wasn't to save money. The smaller house was more expensive. We moved from the exurbs to in town. The new house is 125 years old, in the historic district. Weirdly enough even though the new house is more expensive, the property tax bill is lower. Same county, so the formula should be the same. Which makes no sense to me, but hey I'm not complaining. The funny thing is the people we bought the new house from, moved out to the area we moved from. Grass is always greener I guess right? Different people have different needs and wants and there's a house out there for everyone.