Would Max Stirner deserve a place among the “core” modern Western philosophers?
Is Max Stirner a viable choice to be added to a core Western political philosophy canon?
For one of my classes, the assignment is to choose a Western political philosopher who is not already part of the eight core thinkers we’re studying and argue why they should be added. The current list is Plato, Aristotle, Thomas More, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Marx/Engels.
I chose Max Stirner, but I’m curious what people here think before I fully commit to the argument. (I would like to preface that I am not asking for help specifically on the assignment)
Do you think Stirner is a viable choice for this kind of assignment? Does he deserve to be taught alongside those thinkers, or is he too niche compared to them?
My basic thought is that even though Stirner is not popular with the general public, egoism raises a hard question people need to face: how much of what we do is really for ideals, morality, society, or the state, and how much of it is rooted in our own self-interest?
Would Stirner be a strong way to introduce that conversation in a political philosophy class? Why or why not?