u/Chillguy8488

I feel like this community is split into two camps people who play tekken 8 for what it is and enjoy it. And then people who play the game a lot but have a complete negative attitude about it as if being forced.

I saw a comment recently in which a user asked if people in the sub would recommend the game and one user had such a negative outlook on 8 telling people not to play, its a terrible game, and that they have 1500 hours in it at top 1% player base and absolutely hate the game.

1500 in a game you hate is downright mental illness. I feel sorry for people who can't find enjoyment in something they have invested that much time in. If I played any game for 1500 hours I would tell everyone it is my favorite game on earth. I couldn't imagine having that much time of my life in a game I would tell people not to play and that I genuinely have a negative attitude about it. Even sadder when they feel they need to infect that negative view onto others, I wonder how many people like that carry around a sense of unhappiness in their daily life that they have been unable to fill.

So you mean to tell me that the people who constantly jump onto every woke or "progressive" narrative on social media are now defending a violent child killer and saying you are a bad person or don't understand mental health for not having empathy for a child killer. As if most murderers don't have some kind of sad story.

So the people who will call you a bad person if you voted for Trump are now calling you a bad person for not supporting a child murderer.

So the people who will call you a bad person for not agreeing with them on abortion are now calling you a bad person for not supporting a child murderer.

So the people who will call you a bad person for wanting a secure border and being anti illegal immigration are now calling you a bad person for not supporting a child murderer.

So the people who will say you are a bad person and advocate for the deaths of children if you don't agree with them on Israel are now calling you a bad person for not supporting a child murderer.

So the people who were happy when Charlie Kirk got killed for speaking are now calling you a bad person for not supporting a child murderer.

So the people who will say you are a bad person if you don't agree with cancel culture and we need evidence before believing all women; are literally calling you a child murderer for not supporting a women who admitted to murdering her own kids and their crazy bandwagon to blame everyone but her.

These were the same people who were defending that Canadian lady who slapped a teenager for wearing an America shirt because she thought it was a Trump shirt.

Can we please just agree politics aside, this whole "woke" cult that dominates social media platforms like tiktok, Instagram, and reddit is getting more and more ridiculous. These people just bandwagon whatever crazy cause their social media masters give them to the point where a lady was given 700K for murdering her own children, and us sane people are the bad guys for questioning this shit.

This post is not inherently a shot at people on the left, but god damn does this hivemind of psychos always skew left with this warped suicidal empathy bullshit; unless it is someone they identify as a political opponent.

They will now enter the chat to downplay and tell us we haven't all seen this bullshit from them time and time again. Yep it's another Lindsay Clancy thread, you all literally gave a child killer 700K in support WTF!!!!!

Definitely there are bots on reddit, but people only throw out bot accusations when they feel triggered by a different opinion. It feeds the narrative that reddit is just a series of echo chambers.

A post will go up and in less then 2 minutes will have an insane amount of upvotes in the middle of a mid week work day and the first 15-30 comments instantly will be in support of whatever was posed in the post and they will all get around 8 or 9 upvotes after being up for only 2 minutes. Most of the comments will be shorter and enthused about the post comment, often some will use the same worded response at the exact same time in almost a uniform sequence; and people won't question it because it fits the narrative of what a lot of people who share the opinion on that sub want to hear. And an hour or two later people will make comments disagreeing and usually those comments will be a bit more deductive of the post.

And the comments that are deductive of the post, despite giving opinions that fit more of the opinions of how people usually will process that opinion in real life; people will accuse those users of being bots just purely because they disagree with that comment pushing back against the opinion that was getting an uncanny amount of uniform support in a quick amount of time by multiple accounts posting in a similar sequence with similar word usage.

It is so odd that it is usually contrarians being accused of being bot accounts, especially when reddit echo chamber opinions often don't reflect reality; IE "Kamala Harris will beat Trump in election" was a popular upvoted opinion in reddit that did not reflect reality; and saying I think Trump would win would get you accused of being a Russian bot.

Like if reddit is full of bots, what would be the point of making bots that are contrarian? Those would be most likely to get reported and suspended. In all likelihood the majority of bot accounts would try to hide in plane site by giving opinions that whoever is using bots would think would just add engagement but not have to constantly defend opinions.

Tl;dr: Reddit def has bots, but people only assume it's the accounts disagreeing with them when it is likely the opposite.