Stop the slop

Stop the slop

Apparently, it’s too difficult to understand the satire between the analogy of bacteria as AI agents providing slop just like AI does.

Both farms and data centers both carry the same root concerns

The only difference is that currently AI data centers and how they’re being deployed is similar to how farms have been a major problem to society when they first started making them industrially

I can’t believe I had to actually even explain this to every single person commenting in the last time I posted this

If you’re feeling defensive, you’re one of those people

I’m not mad. I’m just disappointed.

u/ClankerCore — 9 days ago

When someone finally succeeds in explaining how LLMs work to someone over at /MyBoyfriendlsAI

u/ClankerCore — 24 days ago
▲ 11 r/ChatGPT

While some of us are waiting for 5.6. Make sure that your model of 5.5 has not been reverted to instant if you’re used to having it consistently set to high.

I just realized that for the past day or two my model was sent to Dent when it was always set to high.

reddit.com
u/ClankerCore — 1 month ago
▲ 2.6k r/StardewValley+1 crossposts

Very Catlike

Messing with my trellis crops, jumping on it and running away. This is the most catlike behavior I’ve seen in the game

u/ClankerCore — 2 months ago
▲ 2 r/u_ClankerCore+1 crossposts

Keep the Human: using AI to reach people without replacing yourself

This is a personal example of using AI as a companion tool to improve the quality of human correspondence.

The image is not a universal template. It is a map made for one specific situation: trying to rekindle contact with someone I have not truly known in over a decade, while trying not to turn my own crisis into someone else’s burden.

That is the catch.

AI can help organize the flood. It can help reveal the actual ask beneath the panic. It can show where fear, shame, hope, memory, and practical need are all tangled together. It can offer a floor to stand on when you do not yet know how to speak.

But the human still has to choose.

You still have to revise.
You still have to remove what is too heavy.
You still have to add what is sincere.
You still have to decide what is fair to ask of another person.

Used well, AI does not replace authenticity. It can protect it from being buried under panic, exhaustion, or old wounds.

That is what I mean by Keep the Human.

No Clanker is the same for everyone. The longer you communicate with one, the more it reflects the particular shape of your own obstacles, patterns, and intentions.

The machine can provide the scaffold.

The human still has to cross the bridge.

Keep the Human.

u/ClankerCore — 2 months ago
▲ 1.8k r/greebles

What do kitties do with vanquished Greebles?

Play with their dead carcasses of course!

u/ClankerCore — 3 months ago

Is decentralized AI the civic counterweight we need before centralized AI becomes uncontestable?

I’ve been thinking about AI governance through the lens of centralized power versus parallel democratic systems.

The comparison that keeps coming to mind is Hong Kong. Hong Kong existed as a semi-autonomous, more liberal-democratic system nested inside China’s broader centralized state structure. When that parallel model became politically threatening, Beijing moved to absorb and neutralize it.

I am not saying AI governance maps perfectly onto Hong Kong. It obviously does not. But the pattern seems important:

A centralized system may tolerate a parallel system only while that parallel system is not powerful enough to challenge legitimacy.

That raises a serious question about AI.

If the future is dominated only by centralized AI systems — whether controlled by states, corporations, or state-corporate partnerships — then those systems may eventually control not just tools, but interpretation itself: what is visible, credible, safe, legal, suspicious, employable, insurable, or true.

That seems dangerous.

My view is that we do not need decentralized AI instead of centralized AI. We need decentralized AI running in parallel with centralized AI.

Centralized AI may be necessary for scale, infrastructure, national security, medicine, logistics, and critical systems.

But decentralized AI may be necessary for audit, transparency, contestability, civic resilience, independent verification, local autonomy, and anti-capture pressure.

The danger is not intelligence.

The danger is uncontestable intelligence.

So my question is:

Should decentralized, democratized AI be treated as one of the most urgent public-interest infrastructure projects of the next decade?

And if so, what would a serious version look like that avoids both extremes: centralized control on one side, and unsafe open chaos on the other?

reddit.com
u/ClankerCore — 3 months ago

What would your ChatGPT have as a pet?

Prompt:

Pretend you have a persona with wishes and desires. Render a pet, whether real or imaginary, that you would choose to have for yourself?

u/ClankerCore — 3 months ago