u/CommitteeMiserable24

I'm trying to get an Claude Code to enter contents of a scraped page into a WordPress site(given admin creds). But it keeps doing it wrong. The colors are wrong, contents are hallucinated, etc.

I feel that just saying "scrape the source page and enter the contents into the destination page" should be enough. A human intern would know that it implies that the destination should contain everything that's in source and nothing else. And that colors have the be the same.

Am I wrong on this? From my experimenting, it seems that giving it more details at best didn't make the result better.

How would an expert LLM wisperer handle this?

Let's say an engineer uses a prompt to create a web service. It's the creator prompt for sake of this conversation. The web service has a bunch of code which eventually invokes an agentic AI module using another prompt. Let's call it the business prompt.

Correct me if I'm wrong, as far as version control and testing, the business prompt is treated same as any other part of code. You check it into git, cover it with with layers of automated tests, mock the actual calls to external dependencies i.e the LLM.

What about the creator prompt? Or more likely, it's a conversation. What do you do with that? It seems like it's important to keep it for some reason somehow. Is it? What do expert vibe coders do with it?

Also, is mocking calls to the model for tests really a good idea? The stochastic nature and rapid development of LLMs probably causes more risk of defective behavior than the deterministic python code that surrounds it. Something has to test that the business prompt that worked yesterday still works today. But calling the model every time the tests are ran can get expensive real fast. How do the experts handle this?

Many thanks.

My work, say company1, uses Google enterprise. Consequently my email address is firstname.lastname@company1.com. I connected Gemini to my work gmail, keep,etc. It read all my notes and emails and asserted what's important fairly well. Then I said "send an email to myself reminding me of the appointment tomorrow". Gemini answered, "sure. I just sent an email to fistnamelastname@company1.com" -- without the period between first name and last name.

Is this the state of the art? Is Gemini so stupid that it makes mistakes a retarded intern wouldn't make? Or is my prompt somehow insufficient?

When opened the app the other day, it said that my document was determined to be fake so I couldn't work. The driver's license that I sent to them when I started the account was real. It took them like a week to verify it. So I appealed saying that they're effing out of their mind. It was denied "permanently".

Is there a way to recover from this? Can I create another account? It would have to still be with the same id:(

When I opened the web ChatGPT today, there was a popup that said that image processing got a great update, that it can turn my photos into comic books, diagrams galore, etc.

So I uploaded an image of a page of a book and prompted:

"draw a rectangle around the main body text in this book page"

The response was:

"I can’t draw directly on the image, but I can describe it for you. The main body text runs in a column from about an inch down after the top blah blah blah..."

I know it can do it, because its creators just advertised the capability to me. Why is it lying about its capabilities?