Am I using Claude the wrong way?
Basically, I don’t want Claude to do the entire project for me. I use Claude through the browser, and when I’m writing a file, I ask it to help me function by function. Sometimes I implement the functions myself and have it review them, and so on. I never just leave it alone to do the entire project.
Now, I’ve realized an issue with this approach.
If it’s something I don’t already know, Claude doesn’t necessarily do deep research. It might just go with the first implementation it comes up with instead of looking into what is currently being used or what the state of the art is.
And because I also don’t know the subject well enough, I don’t catch that until things start failing. But when I do know enough to call it out, I can ask Claude to dig deeper, and then it usually does more thorough research and comes up with a better approach.
I was working on a computer graphics project, and each time I went through this process, it gave me a different implementation. I ended up creating four different repos. And each time it has a different take on something .. so I am confused and I want to know how others use it.
This was with Opus 5.