

8 days to get a bed in crisis respite
Field report on how the mental health system is chugging along. I popped into see the emergency mental health team after 7 days of moderate-to-intense suicidality. They rang me this morning, 8 days later, to offer me a bed.
If anyone is wondering why our mental health stats look like that… that’s probably a part of it. Two weeks is a long time to want to die before the system has room to help you live.
Banning Attack Ads: Yay or Nay?
Seems to me like you shouldn’t need to shit talk the opposition if you actually have something to stand for yourself. I don’t believe the negativity is good for the elections, for democracy, for participation, for the health and welfare of our politicians (who are happy to wave their hankies around the issue of political violence whenever they get to be a victim of it but don’t seem to care much about deescalation when the rhetoric suits them), or for us. It makes New Zealand a worse place.
I’d be happy to never see another one again tbqh.
Tamatha Paul refuses to apologise over false claim about National MP
nzherald.co.nz'Tears of joy' as Tauranga Hospital's resident cat found safe
1news.co.nzSixteen arrests after 14 cannabis grow houses busted: 'Packed to the brim'
1news.co.nzOne person working 40 hours a week at $31.25 disqualifies your child from the benefit. The living wage is $30.
I said in a comment somewhere that National’s new policy would have people who aren’t even making living wage supporting their (potentially unwell) adult children under 20. This is still true, as the policy doesn’t distinguish between one or two parents. But I thought I’d do the maths to see how close it was for a single earner.
If you find yourself in this situation, you will be better off on $55,000 a year than $65,000 because then your child will receive $20,000 yearly income support that doesn’t have to come from your wallet.
I expect to see a few parents cutting their hours when this policy comes in. It only makes financial sense to do so.
National’s cruel and idiotic schemes won’t result in people working more, it will result in people working less. Which is also what all the rest of their WINZ policies do, incidentally. When you increase the burden of compliance for sick people on benefits, that time and energy comes out of the hours they are already working. Because most jobseekers with medical exemptions do take on some part time work. Just like most young people on benefits already are financially supported by their families. You sort of have to be to survive. If you can’t you’ll be even more fucked mentally or physically by the greater poverty you are living in.
Unwell people aren’t suddenly magically capable of doing more because they have to put more effort in to survive. In fact the stress alone may make them capable of less. Ask me how I know.
(Living wage raises to $29.90 on Sept 1)
Our “List of New Zealand Police controversies” on Wikipedia is growing alarmingly long
en.wikipedia.orgLaw Commission urges stronger hate crime laws, not new offences
rnz.co.nzACC just flew me to Auckland to have an assessment with a doctor who has a clinic in Christchurch
I live in Christchurch. I did not want to wake up at 3am to spend my whole day getting to and from this one appointment. This system is stupid. That is all.
Govt pulls flagship roading projects into the slow lane
1news.co.nzIs the focus on leadership over citizenry fucking this country?
Education has been obsessed with leadership for as long as I’ve been in it — everything was about inspiring leadership, leadership opportunities, developing future leaders, etc. Which is weird to me, because it leadership seems like something that people should be able to develop themselves, and if they can’t, they’re not great leaders, are they?
I’m now back in university as an adult student and am noticing some things I missed the first time around. We have student representation that doesn’t get engaged with, a zillion defunct clubs listed on our clubs list because it’s more beneficial to start a club than participate in one, democratic decision making that hardly anyone participates in and even fewer people are actually informed about, and overly-formalised and structured “leadership ladders” that I can’t help thinking produce people keen on credit and control and not enough people good at participating.
A bit like how I’ve noticed promoting the message “get out and vote” without promoting the message “get politically informed, THEN vote” does not produce good democratic decisions, I’m not sure raising a country of leaders without caring about what everyone else is doing underneath them is very productive. Kinda over leadership language and starting to wonder if it isn’t covering quite a large gap where things like “empathy” and “expertise” should live instead.
Here to eat my words
This will probably be my last post here, because I don’t find it very productive to be accused of being a paid shill/bot every time I try to criticise parties on the left or whenever I raise radical leftist points. I wouldn’t even make this post, but I do feel obligated to publicly retract some statements I’ve made now that Labour have openly disavowed neoliberalism. Which was always the goal of continually criticising Labour for their neoliberalism. To impact their policies via voter discourse.
I have repeatedly said that I won’t vote for a party that won‘t break from neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is more than just the “trickle down effect” that Chris Hipkins condemned yesterday. It is globalist economics, it is exchanging a floating exchange rate for full employment so that the poverty of the unemployed is used to tamp down inflation, it is a deregulated free market economy designed to send money where market demand dictates instead of where society desires. It is the Reserve Bank set up, the lack of wider social considerations legislated for in our corporate setup, and the idea that the government should be “hands off” in the creation and stimulation of industries (something that obviously even neoliberals struggle with, as industry is so heavily shaped by regulation and state investment). I don’t really think Labour intends to tackle all that. But they are willing to openly question the philosophy it rests upon, the economic and political structure that they installed.
So for now, for me, that’s enough. It’s enough to put them back on my voter bingo card, to contemplate the possibility of voting for them, and to endorse them as a major party capable of steering the country in a better direction. Which is not something I believe can be achieved under our current parameters.
On a related note, I find it incredibly alarming how *no one seems to have noticed Labour have said this*. I’m not one to accuse the media of coordinated cover-ups as their oversights are generally just them attending primarily to their own interests. But if this is that, it is telling. Newsroom accused Hipkins of echoing Ronald Reagan in the exact speech where he condemned trickle down economics. One News aired the snippet of Hipkins saying it, which is how I know he even said it, but they, like every other outlet, aren’t emphasising it, headlining it, or even discussing it as a pertinent part of events. Perhaps this is because there is a lot going on politically right now, and we know our media is stretched thinner and thinner every election, but I find it incredibly weird that no one seems to notice Hipkins saying this, let alone realise how big of a deal it actually is.
Anyway, not a shill, not a bot, not a contributor to this sub anymore, but after three years of shitting on Labour for not disavowing neoliberalisms, I wanted to come back here one last time to say:
Okay Chippie, you’ve got my attention again.
Now what?
Probe after two special needs students left in school transport vans
1news.co.nz'They basically entrap and enslave people': Gangs accused of exploiting addicts
nzherald.co.nzThree police staffers facing charges of possessing objectionable publications
rnz.co.nzPetition for phones to make a kiwi (bird) emoji
🥝 —> does not cut it. give me feathers or give me death
Look at all these subpar birds 🦅 🦆🦜🕊️🦢🐓🦃🦉🦤🦩🐦⬛🦚🪿 where is our representation? smh