A realistic look at job security, MOU 1, and workforce reductions
I've seen a lot of chatter on here lately about folks feeling "safe" from layoffs as unionized permanent employees. I want to offer some perspective - Not to alarm anyone, but I do think it's important to be informed, and have the opportunity to plan, if needed.
I posted this in another comment yesterday, but will also paste it here. BCGEU has clearly stated about MOU 1 that:
“The memorandum offers critical job protection for regular employees throughout the term of the collective agreement, with the exception of substantial workforce reductions.”
MOU 1 is not absolute layoff protection. It's more accurate to think of it as a process and a set of obligations. It has mechanisms like reassignment, placement into vacancies, and other workforce adjustment processes.
HOWEVER, if a role is eliminated and there's no suitable placement available, the existence of job security language does not magically create a position that does not exist.
We're seeing this with our federal gov friends:
- An employee is first told their position is affected. This means their role may disappear, the org is restructuring, or decisions are still being made.
- Some get a Guaranteed Reasonable Job Offer (GRJO). That means they're displaced, but the employer expects to place them in another suitable permanent role.
- Some become “opting” employees. This is when a permanent employee whose position has been declared surplus does not have a guarantee of a job offer. They have a 120 day window to choose 1 of 3 career transition options: Departure package, education allowance, or swap with another employee who wants to leave (provided there is someone).
- Some become "surplus" employees. This is where if no suitable placement happens within the entitlement period, layoff happens. This is common given the gov is reducing services/programs/FTEs.
At a high-level, we can expect to see a similar process happen within the BC Public Service.
TLDR: If your job is eliminated, and no suitable placement exists (which is plausible if the broader objective is workforce reduction), layoffs are a possible outcome. The employer can say they tried to find you something, but that job just doesn't exist.