









116610LV “Hulk” Comparison – ARF VS3135 vs VSF VS3135 | Dial, Bezel, Cyclops & Lume
I wanted to put the ARF and VSF 116610LV Hulk side by side because these two are actually quite interesting when you stop looking at them as simply “another green Sub.”
Both are:
Rolex Submariner Date 116610LV
40mm
Green Dial
Green Ceramic Bezel
Oyster Bracelet
3135 Clone Movement
ARF — VS3135
vs.
VSF — VS3135
Looking at the first few shots, the biggest difference for me is the green.
The ARF has a deeper, richer green appearance in these photos, while the VSF looks darker and more black-green depending on the angle.
That's one of the difficult things about comparing the Hulk.
The dial and bezel can change quite a lot under different lighting, so I wouldn't call one “correct” based on a single photo.
The Cyclops and datewheel are easier to compare.
The ARF sample is showing 23, while the VSF is showing 27.
The VSF Cyclops looks particularly clean in the close-up shots. The magnification is more obvious and the date is very easy to read.
That's probably one of the areas where the difference becomes noticeable in normal wear, because the date window is basically impossible to ignore on a Submariner Date.
The dial printing and markers are also quite clean on both.
The overall layout is very similar, but the way the green dial catches the light is different. The ARF has a stronger green presence in these photos, while the VSF has a darker appearance with more contrast between the black dial surface and the green tones.
Moving to the case and crown, both have the familiar 116610LV profile.
The crown guards, case side and polished/brushed transitions are close, but the finishing doesn't reflect light in exactly the same way.
This is one of those things that becomes much easier to judge in hand than from QC photos.
The bracelet and clasp are another interesting comparison.
Both use the Oyster bracelet and solid end links, but the finishing on the links and clasp gives each one a slightly different feel.
ARF has always been interesting to me from a case and bracelet perspective, while VSF seems to put more emphasis on the complete package and small details.
Then there's the lume.
The last comparison shot makes this one pretty obvious.
The VSF lume is noticeably brighter in this particular set of photos, with a stronger blue glow across the dial and bezel pip.
The ARF is still clearly lumed, but the VSF has the stronger visual impact here.
And finally, the movement.
Both are being presented as 3135 clone configurations, so I don't think this should turn into another “one movement destroys the other” argument.
For this comparison, I'd rather focus on what we can actually see:
ARF: strong case and bracelet presence, richer green appearance in these photos.
VSF: stronger Cyclops/date presentation, very clean overall finishing and noticeably stronger lume in this set.
That's why I think the more interesting question isn't simply:
“Which Hulk is better?”
It's:
“Which details matter most to you on a 116610LV?”
If it's the green dial/bezel and metalwork, I can understand the ARF argument.
If it's crystal clarity, Cyclops, date presentation and lume, I can understand why someone would lean VSF.
Personally, I think both are close enough that the differences become more about priorities than a simple GL/RL decision.
Curious what everyone thinks.
If you had one slot for a 40mm 116610LV Hulk, would you take ARF VS3135 or VSF VS3135?