I am just a layman, and while I do know of virus stuff like the Syncytins-1 in mammals.
But from my understanding the viriforms in the Ichneumonid wasps and Braconid wasps are fully inside the wasps own DNA.
Which reminds me of symbiogenesis.
I post this because we know for a fact epstein believed the murdoch press had hacked him in the whole phonehacking scandal that caused the News of the world to close.
To quote this article
>"Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein sent an email to a lawyer claiming "the Palace" had asked him to take legal action against the New York Post over alleged phone hacking.
>In the email, dated July 12, 2011, Epstein sought legal advice about whether he should open a case against the tabloid, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News International, in New York.
>"If you have been following the issues of Rupert Murdoch, and News intl. He closed one of his newspapers in London, after it was caught hacking phone," the email says.
>"Well, there is no love lost in the palace for him. They say they have evidence that the NY post hacked my phones, to get to Prince Andrew.
>"The palace has asked if i would bring an action in new york. a.) I am not a sympathetic figure, but the girl who accused Andrew is even less credible than Strauss Kahn's maid b.) I'm not sure if I want the battle. c) I'm not sure if you would be conflicted.""
Considering how brazen Epstein was with his emails and other activities, I have trouble believing higher ups or those involved in the phonehacking knew nothing about his post arrest activities.
Piers morgan for example was part of News of the world at the time during the phone hacking scandal
And the high court found he knew bout the phone hacking
https://inews.co.uk/news/media/piers-morgan-job-safe-phone-hacking-ruling-2811792
>"Piers Morgan will keep his £50m newspaper and TV contract with Murdoch-owned News UK despite a High Court ruling that he knew about, and was involved in, phone hacking when editor of the Daily Mirror, insiders have said.
>Mr Morgan insisted he had “never hacked a phone or told anybody else to hack a phone” as he rejected Friday’s judgement in favour of the Duke of Sussex, which found “no doubt” that the former editor knew about the practice. "
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/may/23/leveson-piers-morgan-paxman
>Piers Morgan described to Jeremy Paxman how to hack into a mobile phone at a lunch held at the headquarters of the Daily Mirror publisher, the BBC presenter has told the Leveson inquiry.
>Paxman said on Wednesday afternoon that at the same lunch he attended Morgan also teased TV presenter Ulrika Jonsson about the details of private conversations she had had with Sven-Göran Eriksson, at the time the England football manager.
My question is, To what extent epsteins phone was hacked, to what extent did people apart of murdoch media empire knew, and if they knew why did they not report it?
To further add to the connections, There are pictures of Rupert murdoch with Ghislaine maxwell for example, so they at least knew each other and it's hard to believe they had little contact considering rupert and ghislaine's father were massive power brokers in UK politics.
So my mother has triple negative metastatic breast cancer.
And it sounds like the oncologist has given up on my mother.
Looking into her, I have some concerns as It seems this doctor doesnt have the best.. people skills, reviews saying she will write off patients opinions unless they do the footwork and get tests done on there own to have proof among other things.
I find myself concerned that her cancer is being written off as treatment resistant, when i have strong suspicions that the medication she is being given isnt taking into account her metabolism.
This isn't something coming from nowhere either, as I myself have proof showing why i dont respond to many medications.
See I myself had a pharmocogenetic test a few years back showing I process lots of drugs too quickly, and a few slower than average. And many of the chemo and other treatments utilize the same pathways that I myself process too quickly.
So my concern is that she may be being written off as treatment resistant when it may be her metabolism isn't being taken into account.
Plus my mother hasn't had the best treatment at the hospital, lots of neglect because they didnt have the sufficient staff.
So should I push for the pharmacogenetic test for her and a second opinion from another oncologist?