u/Darkmegane-kun

How can a society raise its intellectual and moral standards without restricting freedom or falling into epistocracy? (Plus a question on moral paternalism)

I haven’t read extensively on political philosophy or epistemology, but the current political, economical and my own personal reality got me thinking about the tension between cognitive capacities, moral accountability, and democratic systems. I'm looking for literature or frameworks that address a few interconnected problems.

  1. The Epistocratic Trap vs. Accountability
    We know mandatory education has limits, and some individuals simply do not have the interest to educate themselves beyond a baseline. How do we hold people to higher intellectual and moral standards without coercion? I often think about modern democracies where universal suffrage allows everyone to vote, regardless of their understanding of economics, policy, or even if their motives are morally questionable.

If we were to implement a threshold like a test on the issues we inevitably restrict freedom and form an elite subgroup (an epistocracy), because passing that test would likely correlate with having the socioeconomic resources to get a better education. Is there a philosophical framework for elevating standards and accountability without creating this elite class?

  1. The Problem of "Intellectual Forgiveness" and Agency
    My second question relates to the ethics of how the intellectually gifted (not saying I’m one) should treat the average person. Are intellectuals supposed to be more forgiving of the moral and political oversights of those who are less intelligent or educated?

We generally extend a level of forgiveness to someone who is clinically disabled because we recognize a hard limit on their capacities. If an intellectual views an average person’s lack of engagement as a limit on their capacity (or perhaps an expression of rational ignorance), does treating them with that same "forgiveness" violate their moral agency? Does it cross the line into moral paternalism? Or is the said intellectually gifted person under no obligation to accommodate past a certain point.

reddit.com
u/Darkmegane-kun — 8 hours ago

Are there jobs or the Canadian job market only brutal in the cities. Former planter trying to figure out life after graduation

Hey everyone,

My first season of planting I remember sitting around the campfire with some of my camp mates, talking about how the Canadian job market was going. Someone said that as long as you're willing to go anywhere or do anything, there's always work in Canada. Being a recent immigrant who immigrated with his family to the greater Toronto area, I don’t think I fully agreed back then but getting out of my small bubble and working in the middle of nowhere taught me there’s much to Canada that I don’t understand yet.

I stayed in the city (GTA) this season to knock out some heavy summer classes, and honestly, the entry level job market here is completely dead right now. It's got me thinking a lot about what happens after I graduate, and part of me really misses working outdoors.

I’m currently studying physical and mathematical sciences
I’m curious about the reality on the ground from people actually in the industry:

Are Canadian logging companies or government ministries actually hiring data/stats people to do this stuff, or is it mostly outsourced/experimental?
For those who have stayed in forestry after planting, do you see this tech being used on the blocks?
Has anyone here transitioned from planting into the mapping, GIS, or logistics side of forestry?

I know I'm more academically inclined, and unfortunately not the best planter but I'd love to find a way to merge the math/logistics side of my brain with the forestry sector. Any insight is appreciated!

P.S. If any crews out there need a mid season filler, or any bush related job let me know. The city job market is so dead I'm honestly thinking about dropping my summer classes to head back to the bush for the cash.

reddit.com
u/Darkmegane-kun — 1 day ago
▲ 7 r/judo

Transitioning to BJJ: Is focusing on just 5 ne-waza techniques a good strategy?

Hello everyone,

I’m a yellow belt who did judo for a bit at my uni club. My commute to campus is pushing 2 hours each way, so due to that and a few other reasons, I had to stop doing judo for a while.

Instead, I decided to sign up for the BJJ classes offered at my Muay Thai gym. Yesterday was my first class, and obviously, I was pretty helpless on the ground. It was just rolling, so no standing. I could defend here and there because I have a size advantage over most people, but generally, I could tell they could get me whenever they wanted.

The only thing I could do that was effective was Kesa-gatame. However, because it was a no gi class, they could eventually escape since I didn't have the gi to get a solid grip.

I prefer a simple style perfecting a few moves rather than learning a lot and not being good at them. I decided my strategy will be to focus on just 5-7 ne-waza techniques to hold my own, and then expand from there once I have a good grasp of them.

My questions are: Would this be a good strategy? And for those with experience, what ne-waza worked best for you against BJJ guys? Thanks!

Also I’m about 6’3 (190cm) and 235lbs(107kg) right now so maybe I could use my size too (safely ofc).

reddit.com
u/Darkmegane-kun — 8 days ago