I think politicians are making the wrong argument for AI data centers
Every time this comes up the pitch seems to be “we need more data centers because China.”
Maybe. But if I lived next to one, China probably wouldn’t be the first thing I cared about. I’d care whether my electricity bill goes up, how much water it uses and whether my town actually gets anything out of it.
That’s why the Ohio project is interesting to me. The grid upgrades are supposed to be paid for by the project, they’re using a recirculating cooling setup, and there are actual local-job/community commitments attached.
That seems like a much better model.
If AI infrastructure is really this strategically important, the goal shouldn’t just be “build more data centers.”
It should be “build them so the people living beside them don’t hate them.”
Curious whether people here think that’s realistic.