I am narrowing this to the US because that is what I know about. Something occurs to me. We all know that churches often have members who have gotten divorced for unbiblical reasons. Falling out of love, getting sick of your spouse, finding them annoying, not liking how they handle money, other relational things aside from faith are not legitimate reasons for divorce, the Bible is clear on this. There are conditions where divorce is allowed, but many if not most divorces don't involve them.
Next, how it is handled. The civil legal system has non-biblical standards it goes by. Often believers who get divorced arrange them in unbiblical ways. For example, trying to wrestle custody away from your ex (unless they are abusive or otherwise dangerous) is sinful. Attempting to financially knee cap your former spouse is unbiblical, everyone knows this is done out of greed and vengeance often.
If someone seeks and unbiblical divorce they are entitled to nothing from their former spouse (except child support but that is different). If someone is biblically divorced, but at fault (an adulterer or abuser) even if they repent of what they did, their repentance is in question if they try to financially advantage themselves in the divorce and make themselves a financial dependent of the person they wronged. The church as a discipline responsibility across all of this. Shoe on the other foot, if you are an adulterer you probably owe your former spouse financial support at least for a time if it will cause them serious issues.