Good faith critique of my definition of capitalism

i have been working on definition of capitalism and i want GOOD FAITH critique.

Capitalism is an economic system defined by the private ownership of the means of production and the profit motive of the agents who hold that ownership.
It requires markets - price-mediated exchange, as its operating mechanism, but is conceptually distinct from markets themselves: it neither requires, nor tends to sustain, the classically free conditions of those markets.
i place great emphasis on the definition and conditions of a classically free (numerosity of roughly-equal agents, low friction, price as a pure function of supply and demand) as opposed to to a lassiez faire market (no government intervention), they are not the same.
Left to operate absent exogenous checks, capitalism structurally erodes those conditions, converging markets toward oligopoly rather than preserving them, i will explain the mechanism below.

Within this system, profit-motivated agents are incentivized to seek not only profit (return earned through productive contribution) but economic rent - value extracted purely from ownership and market position, independent of productive contribution, with the barriers created by function of market share and size.
because rent is depended on market share incentives are aligned to concentrate markets, however not all markets offer the same rent .
The magnitude of rent obtainable from a given increase in market share is a function of these parameters i have identified - capital intensity, economies of scale, demand inelasticity, and switching friction which are simultaneously the constituents of barriers to entry.

Because rent-derived resources can be reinvested into strengthening those same barriers (economies of scale, wage suppression via monopsony power, influence over the regulatory and labor environment), increased concentration is both a reward the market provides and a cause of further concentration — a self-reinforcing loop. (this is a source of good in a free market because they encourage capital production but will also end up killing the free market.)

This loop is bounded only by two things:

(1) contestability :new-entrant competition or disruption that redefines the competitive basis rather than contesting incumbents on existing terms whose force is itself a decreasing function of the same three barrier parameters

(2) external check : (regulation, antitrust, institutional constraints on capture), whose effectiveness depends on how insulated they are from capture by rent-derived influence rather than being automatically exogenous.

reddit.com
u/Dizzy-Drink6119 — 12 hours ago

Good faith critique of my definition of capitalism

i have been working on definition of capitalism and i want GOOD FAITH critique.

Capitalism is an economic system defined by the private ownership of the means of production and the profit motive of the agents who hold that ownership.
It requires markets - price-mediated exchange, as its operating mechanism, but is conceptually distinct from markets themselves: it neither requires, nor tends to sustain, the classically free conditions of those markets.
i place great emphasis on the definition and conditions of a classically free (numerosity of roughly-equal agents, low friction, price as a pure function of supply and demand) as opposed to to a lassiez faire market (no government intervention), they are not the same.
Left to operate absent exogenous checks, capitalism structurally erodes those conditions, converging markets toward oligopoly rather than preserving them, i will explain the mechanism below.

Within this system, profit-motivated agents are incentivized to seek not only profit (return earned through productive contribution) but economic rent - value extracted purely from ownership and market position, independent of productive contribution, with the barriers created by function of market share and size.
because rent is depended on market share incentives are aligned to concentrate markets, however not all markets offer the same rent .
The magnitude of rent obtainable from a given increase in market share is a function of these parameters i have identified - capital intensity, economies of scale, demand inelasticity, and switching friction which are simultaneously the constituents of barriers to entry.

Because rent-derived resources can be reinvested into strengthening those same barriers (economies of scale, wage suppression via monopsony power, influence over the regulatory and labor environment), increased concentration is both a reward the market provides and a cause of further concentration — a self-reinforcing loop. (this is a source of good in a free market because they encourage capital production but will also end up killing the free market.)

This loop is bounded only by two things:

(1) contestability new-entrant competition or disruption that redefines the competitive basis rather than contesting incumbents on existing terms, whose force is itself a decreasing function of the same three barrier parameters

(2) external checks (regulation, antitrust, institutional constraints on capture), whose effectiveness depends on how insulated they are from capture by rent-derived influence rather than being automatically exogenous.

reddit.com
u/Dizzy-Drink6119 — 12 hours ago
▲ 1 r/AskLibertarians+1 crossposts

What stops cooperations from simply becoming governments in a libertarian utopia?

what stops jeff bezos in a libertarian world from simply hiring a militia to replace the weak government and make his own strong one to consolidate his monopoly?

what stops all utilities providers from forming a cartel to extort consumers and hiring gunmen to rough up aspiring competitors?

why would a smart capitalist not just bribe suppliers to hike prices on competitors?

the Government cannot be the only source of monopolies.

in my country water companies hire armed men to harm small competitors. how would removing governments stop them?

reddit.com
u/Dizzy-Drink6119 — 14 hours ago
▲ 9 r/austrian_economics+2 crossposts

Has there been any case of unchecked capitalism, no rules or regulations around market size and behaviour, that has not converged into oligopoly?

has there been any case of unchecked capitalism, no rules or regulations around market size and behaviour, that has not converged into oligopoly? every neo-liberal says it will correct itself but i have never seen or heard of it?

Edit: Apparently there can't be an oligopoly without the government? If there are no governments why wouldn't cooperations collude and concentrate? This happened in feudal times with landowners

reddit.com
u/Dizzy-Drink6119 — 1 day ago