
Association between fish-related metabolites and metabolic syndrome risk factors in Japan: INTERLIPID metabolome -wide association study
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-026-04068-7
Association between fish-related metabolites and metabolic syndrome risk factors in Japan: INTERLIPID metabolome -wide association study
Abstract
This cross-sectional INTERLIPID analysis asked whether fish intake and fish-related metabolites line up with metabolic syndrome risk factors in a high seafood-consuming Japanese population. That gap matters because most prior work treated fish as one broad exposure, relied heavily on self-report, and came from populations with much lower seafood intake. The cohort included 1,047 Japanese men and women aged 40 to 59 years, with four multiple-pass 24 h dietary recalls, two timed 24 h urine collections, anthropometrics, questionnaires, and blood sampling, plus urinary and serum profiling by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
Urinary TMAO and taurine, and serum creatine and threonine, correlated with fish intake, while homarine tracked with shellfish intake, all at p < 0.01. Total fish intake was inversely associated with triglycerides, with the clearest signal for low omega-3 fish, and fish intake also tracked with lipoprotein shifts across VLDL, IDL, LDL, and HDL subclasses. On the metabolic syndrome side, urinary TMAO and taurine were linked to lower triglycerides (-3.47 mg/dL, p = 0.01 and -3.88 mg/dL, p < 0.01), urinary taurine to lower systolic BP (-0.73 mmHg per 2 SD, p = 0.03), serum threonine to lower BMI (-0.18 kg/m2 per 2 SD, p < 0.01) and lower diastolic BP (-0.29 mmHg per 2 SD, p = 0.05), and serum threonine to higher HDL-c (0.98 mg/dL per 2 SD, p < 0.01). Urinary TMAO also linked to higher HDL-c (0.47 mg/dL per 2 SD, p = 0.04), while serum creatine linked to higher triglycerides (2.78 mg/dL, p = 0.01). Serum threonine was inversely associated with overall MetS risk (OR 0.84, p < 0.01).
Study Design and Methodology
- Design: Cross-sectional metabolome-wide association study
- Sample size: N = 1,047
- Population: Japanese men and women aged 40 to 59 years
- Study period: Participants surveyed during 1996 to 1998
- Diet assessment: Four in-depth multiple-pass 24 h dietary recalls
- Biological samples: Two timed 24 h urine collections and non-fasting blood
- Metabolomics: 1H NMR spectroscopy for urine and serum
- Lipoprotein profiling: Bruker B.I.-LISA and BI-QUANT-PS
- Statistical adjustment: age, sex, study center; then extensive multivariable models including lifestyle, medication, diet, urinary sodium, and BMI
- Metabolic ward: No
- Blinding: No
- Washout period: No, not applicable to this observational design
Key Findings
- Mean fish intake was 47.0 g per 1000 kcal.
- Urinary TMAO, urinary taurine, serum creatine, and serum threonine correlated with fish intake; homarine correlated with shellfish intake.
- TMAO had the strongest urine biomarker performance for high vs low fish intake, with AUC 0.802.
- TMAO to creatinine ratio had AUC 0.798.
- Taurine had AUC 0.74, and taurine to creatinine ratio had AUC 0.72.
- Homarine was a weaker shellfish biomarker, with AUC 0.64.
- Serum creatine and threonine were weaker discriminators of fish intake than the urinary markers, with AUC 0.58 and 0.57.
- Total fish intake was inversely associated with triglycerides: -2.44 mg/dL, p = 0.02.
- Low omega-3 fish showed the clearest triglyceride association: -2.73 mg/dL, p < 0.01.
- Total fish intake tracked with lower triglycerides in VLDL, IDL, and HDL-4, plus shifts in LDL subclass patterns.
- Raw fish showed stronger metabolomic correlations than fried fish; fried fish often showed weak or null links.
- Urinary TMAO was inversely associated with triglycerides: -3.47 mg/dL, p = 0.01 and positively associated with HDL-c: 0.47 mg/dL, p = 0.04.
- Urinary taurine was inversely associated with triglycerides: -3.88 mg/dL, p < 0.01 and systolic BP: -0.73 mmHg per 2 SD, p = 0.03.
- Serum threonine was inversely associated with triglycerides: -9.53 mg/dL, p < 0.01, BMI: -0.18 kg/m2 per 2 SD, p < 0.01, and diastolic BP: -0.29 mmHg per 2 SD, p = 0.05.
- Serum threonine was positively associated with HDL-c: 0.98 mg/dL per 2 SD, p < 0.01.
- Serum threonine was inversely associated with overall MetS risk: OR 0.84, p < 0.01.
- Serum creatine was positively associated with triglycerides: 2.78 mg/dL, p = 0.01.
- In this cohort, the fish-related metabolites lined up with a more favorable cardiometabolic profile overall, especially taurine and threonine.
Limitations
- Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference.
- Single-country cohort limits generalizability.
- Age range was narrow: 40 to 59 years.
- Non-fasting blood draw can influence lipid and glucose measures.
- One-time biomarker measurement limits repeatability checks.
- Residual confounding remains possible despite broad adjustment.
- This was not an intervention study, so there was no blinding and no washout.
Discussion and Implications
This paper strengthens the case that fish intake in a habitual seafood-eating population lines up with a favorable metabolic profile, and it does so using objective biomarkers rather than diet recall alone. The most interesting part is the metabolite pattern: taurine and threonine looked especially favorable, with lower triglycerides and lower blood pressure, while TMAO behaved like a seafood exposure marker rather than a simple danger signal in this setting.
That matters because it pushes back against the oversimplified “TMAO equals risk” framing. In this cohort, fish-derived TMAO, taurine, and threonine sat alongside lower triglycerides, higher HDL-c, and lower blood pressure, which is exactly why context matters in nutritional epidemiology. The study doesn’t prove causality, but it does show that the source of TMAO matters, and that fish intake, especially certain fish types, maps onto a metabolomic pattern associated with better cardiometabolic status.
Fish intake in this Japanese cohort lined up with lower triglycerides, lower blood pressure, and a better overall metabolic profile.
Taurine and threonine were the clearest favorable metabolites, while TMAO acted as a seafood-linked biomarker rather than a simple harm signal.
This doesn’t settle the TMAO debate, but it does show why fish, taurine, and other seafood metabolites can’t be interpreted through a one-size-fits-all anti-animal-food lens.