u/Downtown-Art2865

I've been testing the Golden Gate developer beta since Monday and the first thing I wanted to test was how far Notify Me gets you before you still need Distill.

In short, it’s closer than I thought, but most reviews overlook crucial details.

What actually worked

I have four Distill monitors running all the time. There were two of them that moved cleanly.

First, a KBDfans product page for a limited-run keyboard kit I've been eyeing. With Distill, it used to be: open Distill, hunt the DOM for the "Add to Cart" button state, set a CSS selector, and worry about whether the class names will be changed before the next drop. Using Notify Me, I just opened the page, clicked the new button, typed "tell me when this product is available for purchase," and it did the rest. I got the same result, no DOM archaeology.

Second, there is a pricing page for a B2B analytics tool I track for work. Using a Distill cloud monitor, I was hitting it every ten minutes and pushing changes to Slack. I got a system notification for the same plan addition from Notify Me. Specific to my use case, the notify me has worked since I didn't need Slack.

There's a caveat everyone's missing though

Some comparisons say "Distill works when your Mac is off, Notify Me doesn't." That’s only half true. Your browser and machine need to be running for Distill's browser extension to work - their own docs state that. Their cloud monitor is the only one that polls independently. If you're on Distill free, you're already in the same boat as Notify Me. The only difference is the payload. The Distill Cloud gives you webhooks, Slack/Teams integration, email and SMS alerts, and a diff history so you know exactly what changed. Notify Me just sends a system notification. That’s it. There's no webhook, no history, no export.

What I still can’t move

My third monitor is on the MCA portal, waiting for a ROC filing acknowledgement PDF. This is stuck on Distill because the link I need doesn't appear on the page until the status changes, so Notify Me's natural language can't watch it. I have an XPath selector in Distill that checks for the presence of <a> tag with a specific  href  pattern containing the document ID, and when it fires, it sends a webhook to an n8n workflow that parses the URL, downloads the PDF to my NAS, and pings me on Telegram. Since there’s no webhook outbound, no XPath, no file handling, and no conditional logic in Notify Me. It can tell me "this page changed," but it can't tell me "the specific PDF link matching this pattern now exists." So I'm stuck with this one.

The fourth monitor is on an internal API status page at work that uses a client cert that Safari doesn't handle. That's not even a conversation since Notify Me is only available on Safari.

On “Describe an Extension”

I haven't gotten into the details yet. In Apple's WWDC session, they showed a demo about tracking cooking recipes with web extensions - no Xcode required. Before I form a strong opinion, I'll test it against a couple of userscripts I use - a LinkedIn feed cleaner and a Hacker News comment highlighter But I'm still not sure whether it builds an exportable .safariextz or just injects session-level data. Yet to see a straight answer.

What I want to know

For anyone who has actually tested it against their real use cases:

1. Were you able to move a non-trivial Distill workflow to Notify Me? Not a price check but something with real stakes.
2. What do you track that’s too specific, too conditional, or too tied to the rest of your stack that no native browser feature can touch?

Last week I posted my notes on Little Snitch 6 here and it got a lot more traction than I expected. A bunch of you DM’d me with follow-up questions and tool recommendations, which honestly made my week. So I figured I’d keep going while I’m in the mood to actually write things down instead of just hoarding tabs.

This one’s been brewing for a while. I’ve been on Alfred for something like 7 years, dabbled with Raycast on and off for the last two, and Tahoe finally pushed me to sit down and audit what I’m actually using each tool for. And the more I read recent threads here, the more I noticed the same confusion popping up: people treating Raycast, Alfred, and Spotlight like they’re the same category of tool with different paint jobs. They’re not. And the dedicated search apps (FAF, Cling, EasyFind, HoudahSpot) are doing something completely different that gets lumped in with launchers way too often.

So this is my attempt to lay out what I’ve actually figured out from daily use. Not a tier list. Not “best launcher 2026.” Just where each tool fits in my workflow and where I think the sub is mixing things up.

What changed in Tahoe’s Spotlight (briefly)
If you’ve been ignoring this because “Spotlight is Spotlight,” it’s worth a fresh look. Tahoe’s update genuinely shifted what stock Spotlight is capable of:

1. Four sections accessible via ⌘1–⌘4: Applications, Files, Actions, and Clipboard. Apple doesn’t call them tabs in the official copy, but functionally that’s how they work.
2. Direct actions baked in. Apple’s wording: “hundreds of new system and app actions right from Spotlight,” including running shortcuts, sending messages, creating events.
3. They’ve also introduced “Quick Keys” (type “SM” → Send Message style shortcuts).
4. Searchable clipboard history. Default retention is 8 hours, configurable from 30 minutes up to 7 days in System Settings → Spotlight. One privacy concern though: it’ll store passwords you copied unless you turn it off. Alfred and Raycast both detect password-manager fields and skip them.
   Better ranking using “intelligent suggestions based on your routines”, Apple’s words, but it does feel noticeably smarter on recently used apps and files.

It’s not Raycast. It’s not Alfred. But it’s no longer the bare-bones launcher people remember from a few macOS versions ago.

The actual difference between Spotlight, Alfred, and Raycast
This is the part I think gets flattened the most in this sub.
Spotlight in Tahoe is now a competent system launcher with quick actions and clipboard. It’s tightly integrated with macOS, free, and fast because Apple controls the index and rendering layer.
Alfred is a power user’s keyboard interface. The Powerpack workflows (one-time purchase, with Mega being the lifetime-upgrades license) are still the deepest customization layer of any of these tools. If you’ve ever written a workflow that takes a clipboard URL, parses it, hits an API, and dumps the result into a note in under a second, you know what I mean. Alfred doesn’t even require an account.
Raycast is closer to a developer command palette that grew up. The extension store has thousands of extensions, the AI features are aggressive, and it ships new things almost weekly. It’s also the heaviest of the three by a meaningful margin and account-tied for most of the good stuff.

Here’s how I actually score them on the things that matter day to day: please refer the attached screenshot.

A few things worth saying out loud:
On resource use and privacy, this ties back to my Little Snitch post from last week. Raycast was one of the apps that surprised me when I started actually monitoring outbound connections. It’s not malicious, they’re upfront in their docs that the core app is local-first and their AI runs through third-party providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, others), but it’s chatty if you turn on AI, Cloud Sync, or any account features. Alfred barely shows up. Spotlight is a system process so it’s a different conversation. If you care about that stuff, it’s worth running Little Snitch (or LuLu) for a week and just watching what each one does.

On pricing, I keep seeing “Raycast is free!” framed as a knockout argument. The free tier is genuinely generous (window management, clipboard history with 3-month retention, snippets, basic features all free), but the moment you want AI or Cloud Sync, you’re at $8/mo billed annually, which is $96/year forever. If you pay monthly it’s $10/mo. Alfred’s Mega license is £59 once and I’ve been on it across three Macs and four major macOS versions without paying again. Different models, both reasonable, but they shouldn’t be compared as if they’re equivalent. Worth knowing: the standard Alfred £34 license isn’t lifetime — only Mega is.

Where the dedicated search tools come in (and why launchers can’t replace them)
This is the part I really want people to read.
Spotlight, Alfred file search, and Raycast file search all rely on macOS’s Spotlight index in some form. That index is good, but it has fundamental gaps:

1. It doesn’t index everything. System files, hidden folders, dotfiles, files inside packages, files on external drives that haven’t been indexed, files inside ignored folders, they all are invisible to Spotlight-based search.
2. Network shares (SMB, AFP, NFS) typically aren’t indexed at all. If you work off a NAS, Spotlight is mostly blind to it.
3. It indexes mostly by name and a subset of metadata. Deep content search across non-indexed file types is unreliable.
4. It can get stale, corrupted, or just refuse to reindex without manual intervention. Apple has an entire support article on rebuilding it with mdutil.
   The dedicated tools each solve a different version of this problem, and they don’t overlap as much as people assume.

Find Any File (FAF) does live, recursive, brute-force searching of the actual filesystem. No index. So it finds hidden files, system files, dotfiles, files inside ignored folders, network volumes, places Spotlight literally cannot reach. It’s slower than Spotlight on large drives because it’s doing real work (NAS searches can take a few minutes), but it finds things nothing else does. $6 from the developer’s site (apps.tempel.org), $8 on the App Store. There’s a Pro tier in development for power-user use cases. I use it almost weekly for “where the hell did Xcode put that file” situations.

Cling is the one I want to be careful about because the description gets confused a lot. Cling (lowtechguys.com) is not a HoudahSpot-style query builder. It’s a fuzzy file finder modeled on Windows’ Everything, meaning it’s optimized for “I roughly know the name of the file, find it instantly.” It builds its own in-memory index using fd + fzf and tracks changes via FSEvents, so it can index System and Root scopes that Spotlight skips. What it does NOT have: boolean operators, attribute search (date, size, EXIF, author), or saved metadata queries. The developer is explicit about this — Cling is for speed and simplicity, not complex queries. Free with limits (caps at 500 results); Pro is €12 one-time for unlimited results, system/root scopes, and up to 5 personal Macs. Open-source on GitHub, active development.

EasyFind is the freeware classic from DEVONtechnologies. Old UI, but it does live recursive content search, supports regex, boolean operators, wildcards, phrases, and tag/comment search. It ignores Spotlight entirely, no indexing required. If you’re searching for a string of text inside a thousand log files, EasyFind will find it when nothing else will.

HoudahSpot is the power user’s GUI on top of Spotlight. It does rely on the Spotlight index (the dev is explicit: if Spotlight indexing is off or broken, HoudahSpot won’t work either), but it gives you a real query builder, attribute-based searches (date ranges, kind, owner, tags, GPS coordinates, image resolution, custom metadata), saved templates, and proper result management. Current version is 6.7, fully Tahoe-compatible. $34 single-user, $52 family. Also on Setapp if you’re already subscribed. If you do a lot of professional file work (legal, journalism, research, design archives), this is the one.

Quick way to think about which to reach for:

- I need to launch an app or run a quick command → launcher (Spotlight / Alfred / Raycast)
- I know roughly what file I want and it’s a normal file in a normal place → Spotlight or Alfred file search
- I roughly know a filename and want it found instantly, including in system folders → Cling
- I need to find a file Spotlight refuses to find (packages, network drives, root) → FAF or EasyFind
- I need to search inside file contents across many files with regex → EasyFind
- I need to build a complex, repeatable, attribute-based query → HoudahSpot

Where I actually landed
After all of this, my setup is genuinely a mix. Alfred is still my main launcher and snippet manager because the muscle memory is too deep and the workflows I’ve built over the years aren’t worth rebuilding. I use Tahoe Spotlight for clipboard now, which is a small but real change. I keep Raycast installed for a few specific extensions and the AI quick-action thing, but it’s not my daily driver. And I have FAF and HoudahSpot in my dock for the file searches that actually matter, with Cling on a hotkey for the “find this thing now” moments.

The thing I’ve stopped doing is treating “launcher” and “file search tool” as the same category. They’re not. A launcher is a keyboard interface to your system. A file search tool is a query engine over your filesystem. Different jobs, different tools.

Pricing reality check
If you add up what people often recommend on this sub, you get: Raycast Pro ($96/yr, billed annually) + a paid clipboard manager + a paid window manager + a paid snippet tool. Easily $150-200/yr forever. Or you can go: Spotlight (free) + Alfred Mega (£59 once, roughly $80) + FAF ($6 one-time) + HoudahSpot ($34 one-time, occasionally on Setapp) + Cling Pro (€12 one-time) + EasyFind (free). One-time spend, lifetime use. Just something to think about before subscribing to another thing.

Questions for the sub
I’m genuinely curious about a few things and would love to hear how others are using these:

1. What’s your main daily use case for search and launching, and which tool actually handles it? I think a lot of disagreements here come from people optimizing for different jobs and not realizing it.
2. Anyone made a real switch after Tahoe (away from Raycast or Alfred toward Spotlight, or in the other direction)? What pushed you?
3. Which dedicated file search tool do you reach for, and what’s the specific situation that makes you open it?

No affiliation with any of these tools. Bought Alfred Mega myself years ago, paid for HoudahSpot, FAF, and Cling Pro out of pocket, used Raycast on the free tier and briefly trialed Pro, EasyFind is freeware.

18 months ago I started using Obsidian as a coding knowledge base. Mostly engineering notes, AI/LLM research, and a running learning log of stuff I keep forgetting and re-learning. Vault’s at around 3,200 notes now, ~14k internal links, and I’ve rebuilt my plugin setup from scratch twice because it kept getting bloated.

This isn’t the popular plugin list. It’s the one that’s left after I uninstalled everything I wasn’t actually opening. Sharing in case it saves someone else the cycle.

Templater — the only plugin I’d quit Obsidian over if it disappeared. I have one daily note template with a tasks section, a “what I’m reading” pull, and an auto-link to the previous day. The “auto-link to previous day” part is what made my daily notes actually connected instead of being orphaned islands.

Dataview — I resisted this for months because it looked like a database thing and my brain isn’t a database brain. Then I needed a way to find every note tagged #stuck and I wrote my first query and it took 4 lines. Now I have a “things I gave up on” page that auto-populates and it’s weirdly therapeutic to scroll through.

Tasks — I tried using it as a full GTD system and it was overkill. Now I use exactly one feature: due dates with recurring rules. That’s it. Recurring tasks inside daily notes is the thing that finally got me to stop using a separate todo app.

QuickAdd — capture-from-anywhere shortcut. I have one called “log this thought” that opens a one-line input, dumps it into an inbox file with a timestamp, and closes. The whole loop is under 2 seconds. Most days I use this 10+ times.

Calendar + Periodic Notes — pairing them is obvious but worth saying. The thing that took me too long to figure out: weekly notes are more useful than daily notes for actually reviewing patterns. Daily notes are a stream. Weekly is where you notice you’ve been complaining about the same thing for a month.

Linter — boring, invisible, runs on save, fixes my heading spacing and YAML frontmatter so I don’t have to think about it. The plugin you forget exists, which is the highest praise.

Style Settings — not a workflow plugin, just lets me actually read what I’m writing. I bumped the editor font size, tightened line height, and softened the background and suddenly I could write for an hour without my eyes bailing on me.

Excalidraw — I have one specific use case: sketching out system designs and architecture diagrams for engineering posts. Embeds inline, opens fast, doesn’t try to be Figma. The fact that drawings are markdown-linkable means I can pull them into notes from anywhere.

Omnisearch — Obsidian’s native search is fine. Omnisearch is fine and fuzzy and searches inside PDFs. I keep all my AI papers in Obsidian and being able to search “transformer attention” across 80 PDFs in under a second is the difference between actually using my reference library and pretending I will someday.

Bases (core, not a plugin, but it counts) — replaced my big ugly Dataview tables with something I can actually filter visually. I migrated my “AI papers I want to read” tracker over and it’s the first time I’ve enjoyed looking at it. Still figuring out where Dataview ends and Bases begins, but that’s the fun part.

Two I dropped in the last six months: Kanban (I never opened the boards I made — turns out I don’t think in columns) and Projects (felt like I was building a Notion clone inside Obsidian, which is a sign you’ve lost the plot). Both are good plugins. They just weren’t for me.

The thing I keep relearning: every plugin you add is a small ongoing tax on the speed and simplicity of the app. I keep my count under 15 because anything more and Obsidian starts feeling like every other tool I bounced off.

Curious what’s on other people’s lists, especially anyone using Bases heavily — feels like the sub is split between “this changes everything” and “Dataview still wins” and I can’t tell which camp I’m in yet.

I’d been hearing about Little Snitch for years at this point. Colleagues swore by it. A couple of friends in security said it was the one paid app on their Mac they’d never give up. This sub mentions it constantly. And I kept putting it off.

The reason was honestly just the price. $59 for a one-time purchase, single device. I’ve bought plenty of paid Mac software before like Bartender, Things, Soulver, the usual, but $59 for one machine felt like a lot for something I wasn’t sure I’d actually use. The free options (Lulu, the built-in firewall) seemed “good enough” on paper.

Six months ago I finally decided to check. Writing about it here in case anyone else has been on the fence for the same reason.

Why I finally bought it

A couple of things tipped me over:

I’d read one too many threads about how chatty modern apps are with telemetry and analytics, and I realized I genuinely had no idea what was leaving my machine.
I tried Lulu first for about a week. It blocks fine, but it doesn’t show you anything. I wanted visibility, not just a deny list.
The 30-day demo mode (it cycles on and off in 3-hour windows) was enough to convince me the alert UX was actually decent, not the clunky popup hell I’d half-expected.

So I bought it.

First night, Adobe Creative Cloud alone tried to phone home to something like 22 different domains in the first 20 minutes. I hadn’t even opened Photoshop. That was the moment I realized why everyone had been telling me to buy this thing.

The first week is rough

Not gonna sugarcoat it. The first few days were a mess of popups. Every app I opened wanted to talk to five different servers and I had no idea which ones were legit. Spotify needs to reach its CDN, fine. But why is iStat Menus connecting to an analytics domain in Ireland? Why is my PDF reader checking for updates and sending telemetry and loading fonts from a third-party host?

I almost uninstalled it twice. The cognitive load of “is this connection real or sketchy” on top of actually trying to work was rough.

What saved me:

- I stopped trying to make perfect decisions. If something looked legitimate (CDN, official domain, obvious update server), I allowed it for that app only and moved on.
- I leaned on the Research Assistant feature pretty heavily. It tells you what a domain is for and whether it’s known sketchy.
- I turned on Silent Mode (deny mode) for a couple of evenings while I just watched the Network Monitor and learned what normal looked like.

By end of week 2 the popup volume had dropped maybe 80%. By week 4 I was getting maybe 2-3 alerts a day, almost always for something new.

What I actually use it for now (months 2–6)

Honestly, the popups aren’t even the main value anymore. The Network Monitor is. Being able to open it and see, in real time, every process on my machine and what it’s connecting to — that’s the thing I didn’t know I wanted.

Some specific things I caught or learned:

- A small menu bar utility I’d been using for over a year was reaching out to an analytics endpoint every 15 minutes. Not malicious, just noisy. Blocked it, app still works fine.
- Adobe is genuinely something else. Even with Creative Cloud signed out, there are background processes that try to reconnect constantly. My deny rules for Adobe alone are probably 30+ entries.
- One of my browsers was making connections I couldn’t explain even with all extensions disabled. Turned out to be a built-in feature I’d never noticed in settings.
- Random one: a game I hadn’t opened in 4 months was still checking in daily with its publisher’s telemetry server.

The traffic map and the live connection graph are honestly more useful for vibes than for action. But the DNS encryption and the blocklist subscriptions (I’m running Steven Black’s hosts list through it) are doing real work. According to my stats panel I’m at something like 27,000 blocked connections over 6 months. No idea how meaningful that number actually is, but it’s not zero.

The honest pros and cons

What’s good:

- The Network Monitor is genuinely best-in-class. Nothing else on macOS gives you this view.
- Rule management scales reasonably well even with ~800 rules. Search and filtering work.
- It’s stable. In 6 months I’ve had 2 crashes. Performance hit is invisible to me.
- The DNS encryption + blocklist combo means it’s also doing some of what a Pi-hole would, without the Pi.
- Native feel. It looks and behaves like a Mac app, not an Electron port of a Windows tool.

What’s not:

- The price still stings a little. $59 single-device is on the high end for one-time Mac software, especially if you have multiple machines. The family/multi-device pricing helps but it’s still not cheap.
- The learning curve is real. If you don’t enjoy thinking about networking even a little, you’ll bounce off it.
- Rule sprawl is a thing. After 6 months my rule list is genuinely hard to audit. I’ve started over once.
- Alerts during screen sharing or presentations are awkward. Silent Mode helps but you have to remember to flip it.
- Occasional false positives where I block something and an app starts misbehaving in non-obvious ways. Tracking that down took me a couple of hours more than once.

Edge cases worth flagging

A few things that took me a while to figure out:

- Battery impact: basically nothing I can measure. Older Intel Macs apparently see more of a hit from what I’ve read.
Major macOS updates can break things briefly. The Sequoia 15.1 update needed a reinstall of the kernel-level component for me. Took 5 minutes but caught me off guard.
- iCloud-related connections are a rabbit hole. Block the wrong one and Calendar sync silently fails for a day before you notice.
- VPN interactions: Mullvad needed some specific allow rules before it would route correctly.

What about Lulu / Radio Silence / built-in firewall?

Like I said, I tried Lulu for about a week before paying for Little Snitch. It’s free, it’s open source, the developer is great. For pure outbound blocking it works. What it doesn’t have is the Network Monitor depth, the traffic map, the connection history, or the same rule management. If you mainly want a “block this thing forever” tool and don’t care about visibility, Lulu is genuinely fine and you should try it first — you might not need to spend the $59.

Radio Silence is even simpler — it’s basically a deny list. Cheaper, easier, way less powerful.

The built-in macOS firewall doesn’t do outbound at all. It’s not in the same category.

So for me, Little Snitch earned the price by being the only one with the monitoring layer. If I just wanted blocking, I’d be on Lulu and $59 richer.

Was the price worth it

Six months in, yeah. I’d buy it again. The thing that finally justified the cost in my head wasn’t any single feature — it was that I now actually understand what’s running on my machine. That’s not a thing I can get from a free tool.

That said, I want to be fair: if you’re someone who’s going to install it, click “allow” on everything, and never open the Network Monitor, don’t pay for this. You’re paying for visibility and control, and visibility only matters if you’re going to look. Lulu plus a decent blocklist is a better deal for that crowd.

Not affiliated with Objective Development. Paid full price. No referral.

didn’t really plan it. started using Wispr Flow for slack replies because typing them felt slow, then it crept into emails, then talking to claude, then rough draft blog posts. the screenshots above are from this morning and I genuinely didn’t realize the number was that high.
the weird part is I’m not a slow typer. 83 wpm is fine. but voice + reformatting is just a different gear once you stop fighting it.

what surprised me most is how good the cleanup has gotten. I ramble, half-finish sentences, change direction mid-thought, and it still comes out readable on the other side.

I’ve also been poking at VoiceInk lately, which is open-source on github and runs whisper locally. paid app for the polished build, but you can compile from source. accuracy is genuinely close to the paid tools and nothing leaves your mac, which is the part that keeps pulling me back.

few open questions:

1. is anyone here fully on a local setup? whisper.cpp + something custom, or just VoiceInk?
2. for people on Wispr or Superwhisper — does the cloud reformatting actually justify staying paid, or is local catching up?

curious what everyone’s running these days.

LLMs are great for repetition and speed, but good juniors become seniors, ideas, and long-term leverage. Cost optimization can miss value optimization.

Original Post

macfolio.com showed up in my feed today. Decent looking site, covers apps, hardware, desk stuff, books. Spent some time on it.

Noticed TypoTab is in the catalog. Same person who runs the directory built TypoTab. No "made by us" tag, no disclosure, just sitting in there next to everything else. The Featured section has a small "may include paid promotions" line, and outbound links route through their own shortener with UTM tracking.

Is that normal for curation sites now or am I being weird about it?

every resource I find says ScreenCaptureKit ignores sharingType = .none on macOS 15+ and captures the composited framebuffer anyway. okay, fair.

but then how is Cluely working? their whole product is hiding a window from recordings. and they’re not alone, there are a handful of apps doing exactly this, shipped, in production, apparently fine.

I’m building something where this needs to actually hold. “probably works” isn’t good enough for my use case. so I can’t figure out if the breakage is rare, recorder-specific, or if these products are just quietly shipping with a known hole.

has anyone actually seen it break? which macOS version, which recorder?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​