
WA PM Firm decides to get tenants to do routine inspections…
I’ve heard about this occurring elsewhere in Australia, as former PM and a LL this is pretty outrageous.
When I was a PM (tried it as a job, as I heard it was family friendly, not my experience) with my construction industry experience I was picking previously unreported by PM structural issues eg decks about to collapse and potential for major damage due to eg roof leaks.
The more experienced PMs felt jilted I was seeing and reporting things they missed, the Agency owners were p!ssed as well (cause me pinging things meant their agency wasn’t looking after the places well).
Having tenants conduct routine inspections might be preferable to them due to less intrusion, but *should this be found ok by the regulators* (I’m being careful with what I say) tenants aren’t qualified PMs nor is there no guarantee they can spot issues, so Insurers could refuse to cover for damage due to no proper inspection actually being done.
Plus - as a LL you’re paying for the PM to do the inspections…