I’m sure many of you are already aware of them. they keep it light. And skewer that Rogan bs
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-know-rogan-experience/id1788550490?i=1000782117400
Forensic anthropologist consulted by HSCA. They could not abide with his reconstruction. No shit. An exit next to their entry? Oops. His expertise was in skull reconstruction.
One of my favorites the LN crowd uses is
" Nearly every pathologist who has examined the autopsy materials first-hand has said that evidence supports the lone gunman explanation."
to which the reply was
"Not nearly every. Actually, every"
also,
"Meanwhile, every forensic pathologist who examined the evidence said there was no evidence of a frontal shot. Meaning, you're full of beans, there is no evidence of a frontal shot."
Followed by
"Conspiracy kooks are incapable of accepting these facts!"
This assertion is demonstrably false. laughably so. If this were true, no one would be talking about this 60+ years later.
The various panels and committees were often at odds internally. Once again, reading panel reports or statements from a committee will not reveal the disagreement among "the experts".
Hell, the HSCA autopsy conclusions disagreed with the WC report! But yeah, everyone just all agreed?! Please.
A brief list; there are many more.
Russell Morgan, radiologist of Clark Panel, just couldn't get past believing the bullet to the head was not a FMJ
David O. Davis MD, radiologist, FPP HSCA, disagreed vehemently with the Dox/Baden drawing in his description of the extent of the head wounds. He also discussed the "mystery" metal fragment in the AP image, that Humes and Boswell just never saw. But yes, they all agree.
Dr. Norman Chase, wound ballistics expert, interviewed by HSCA, but no report was submitted (heaven forbid). he said this was not the kind of wound expected from a single FMJ bullet
Dr. Angel. Forensic anthropologist. Put the bullshit Baden /Dox drawing to shame. He demonstrated the massive nature of the head wound compared to the bullshit that Baden tried to sell us
There are many more such examples.
As to my assertion that the head wounds prove more than one shooter, there are several radiologists from private practice that have seen the extant images in the archives in person, as well as Larry Sturdivan, who incidentally confirmed the low inshoot at the occiput. These radiologists confirm what we can see --the high fragment trail, inconsistent with a single low shot to the occiput. Hell this entire conundrum led the HSCA to change the entry wound in the head! Because for sure they could never just say "two shots, minimum".
The link I fucked up earlier was a talk given by Pearcy. He served as the Joint Historian for the CIA and Dept of State. He describes himself as a CIA whistleblower (and I know the lone nutters will explain why he's not). Technically, he was a CIA contractor, I believe.
Late last year he began speaking publicly about a document he found (50 pages). He also speaks about the culture of clandestine operations by US forces following WW2. I know this does not interest lone nutters, but I'll provide this context anyway, since it was so kindly requested by a lone nutter friend.
For the majority of us that understand the nature of this crime, this information is illuminating. It follows a known pattern of deception and obfuscation, coverup, and lies promulgated by the US government and major media. Time and again, little by little, documentary evidence slowly piles up revealing the deception. Vietnam War is an easy example here. The public was lied to repeatedly, war crimes covered up, and leaders committed self-serving acts at the expense of the American soldier and the American public. It has taken decades to uncover some of this history. So it is with JFK.
The document Pearcy found has to do with the CIA deliberately deceiving Blakey when he was chief counsel to the HSCA. In the talk I tried to link, he speaks about many things of interest beyond JFK. The question and answer period was particularly interesting to me.
I hope this link works to an article from last year.
https://www.axios.com/2025/11/19/whistleblower-secret-cia-report-jfk-assassination
CIA whistleblower.
The other day one of the Lone Nutters on here said there have been no whistleblowers. I understand why that person might think that. Many LNers have a very constrained paradigm of the Event, of the Action in Dealey Plaza. Here is just one example, John Stockwell. There are others.
For those interested you find references to him online. His whistleblowing activities began decades ago and covered a wide array of CIA activities.
Here’s a clip of him speaking about JFK’s bloody murder.
Responded to my request for the Itek report.
The answer was ‘in person viewing only’ due to copyright laws.
Sometimes reading about the assassination you come across something that just blows your mind. For those that don’t know Lattimer is a big line nutter. And a urologist. And he did some shit to prove Oswald alone that was bogus af. Like the drawing I’ll attach at the end. Here’s a few more fun facts about Lattimer.
What The Fk
About the photo—that entry point looks like about C3. Hey you can’t expect a urologist to know cervical and thoracic anatomy now, can you?
I believe the title of the talk is Junk Science and the JFK Assassination. There may be claims by the speaker with which I disagree. But the vast majority of this talk I believe is well done. Especially important is his discussion near the end regarding peer review and errors of thinking. I’ve seen other recordings and presentations of this lecture that were of poor quality. This one is a good presentation and recording of this material.
Lie detector stuff was a total shambles. HSCA took apart Herndon, the Warren Commission expert. It’s a wild read. https://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/hsca/reportvols/vol8/pdf/HSCA_Vol8_RubyPolygraph.pdf
I’ve been asked if I have watched this entire show. Well, now I have. DrZimmerman’s analysis, as mistaken as it is, is nowhere near as egregious as the recreated single bullet shot. Holy crap. They basically showed you have to shoot Kennedy thru the chest to get this thing to work. They never show the Kennedy torso from the front. Never. Then they take their findings findings to an expert who concludes those wounds on both torsos were very unlikely caused by one bullet. There’s even more wrong but I’ll stop here.