Oncologic Emergencies
Harvard’s looking for an academic EM physician to be the director of an effort to study and develop
Protocols for Oncologic Emergencies.
What a turning point for our field of this turns into something big. New Fellowship?
Harvard’s looking for an academic EM physician to be the director of an effort to study and develop
Protocols for Oncologic Emergencies.
What a turning point for our field of this turns into something big. New Fellowship?
Looking at ABEM’s new certifying exam requirements, I was just wondering if every emergentologist was skilled and comfortable in all these procedures & USs and documented appropriately enough for reimbursement just how much more financial upside our specialty would have.
Just want your honest thoughts please, not interested in the jokes/shit talking
Hi!
Would someone share please thank you!
I want to know y’all’s experiences and thoughts. performing and interpreting a POCUS is a procedure that is reimbursable, you would think with how much we do it we’d make a lot more money like a GI doing a colonoscopy or ENT doing a flex lary. Rads gets paid for interpreting an XR why can’t we for POCUS (where we don’t even need a technician?)
I’d assume the same thing goes on for ICUs like im sure Crit attendings would LOVE to bill and make more for their POCUS.
I asked ChatGPT how much we could make per scan and it said the below like why do we not capture this?
FAST exam: ~$25–60
Cardiac echo limited: ~$30–80
Biliary: ~$30–70
DVT study: ~$40–100
Renal/bladder: ~$25–60
Procedural guidance (central line, abscess drainage, etc.): can add additional billing opportunities
EDIT:
Sounds like there’s income to be made but infrastructure’s the problem, maybe an AI overseer to ensure image quality and indication? If if we do RUSH/eFASTs and can get compensated for those that’s a step in the right direction without butting heads with Rads, admin always complains about ED losing money well shit this is a way to increase revenue