Help me settle a debate
Today an argument began surrounding one of Grimm’s attacks, specifically where he lifts his wing and shoots… well… that’s the debate. I’m saying they’re fish, or at least inspired by them, and the other person says absolutely not, they’re likely some sort of bat. Here are overviews of the two arguments:
Me: attack anatomy has many close ties to fish anatomy, such as “feathered” fin and tail appearance and placement like beta fish, eye and mouth placement like goldfish, and “swimming” motions. Fish also move in schools especially when in a defensive moment, just like in the attack.
Other person: there’s no correlation between fish and the Grimm troupe (which we agree that Grimm is a bat) so there’s no logical basis for the attack to be fish.
(Thomas, if you see this and feel I didn’t do your argument justice, feel free to correct me in a comment or something)