u/EfficiencyGood4815

Lithuania here. I've been doing Wolt for 3+ years and the app has always been buggy when offers come in. Normally I'd lose maybe 10-20% of orders I actually want because the price doesn't load, the Accept button stays disabled, or I press it and the order just disappears.

Today it's on another level. I'd say around 70% of the offers I want are basically impossible to accept. Order pops up with no price, I sit there waiting like an idiot, sometimes 30-60 seconds or more, then the price finally loads and the button becomes active. I press Accept and boom, error / task gone / already assigned. What the f**k is the point of sending me an offer if your own app won't let me accept it?

And this isn't some new tiny bug. This sh*t has been happening for years. I genuinely don't understand what their app team is fixing with all these updates because the most basic function of a courier app, showing an offer and letting you accept it, is still unreliable as hell.

Support is useless for reporting it too. They give the same "check your internet / restart your phone" answers, and you can't even attach a screen recording in chat, only screenshots. A screenshot obviously can't show the app sitting frozen for a minute and then throwing the order away.

Anyone else getting this much worse today or after the latest Android update?

I posted in the Telegram subreddit because I wanted to know if other Android users are seeing the same bugs I am. Nothing weird, no account support request, no spam. Just a list of issues with the official Android app, and the post got stuck awaiting moderator approval.

What annoys me is that this is exactly the kind of thing a product community should be useful for. I used Telegram X for years, but once it fell behind on features I had to move to the main app, and I was honestly shocked at how much worse it feels. Frequent freezes, video messages sometimes hanging and disappearing, voice messages resuming from a random position after pausing, the full reaction picker taking a couple seconds to load, and even opening the gallery to send photos feels noticeably slower than Telegram X did.

I’m not claiming Telegram itself controls that subreddit, because I don’t know who actually moderates it. But from a user perspective, putting a basic critical bug report into manual approval is a terrible look. If negative posts sit in a queue while praise and normal chatter go through, the community starts looking artificially positive whether that was intentional or not.

Is this just a common problem with large product subreddits? At what point does aggressive filtering stop being moderation and start distorting what users are actually experiencing?

Anyone else having this issue with Buffer today?

Every Pinterest post I try to publish through Buffer is failing with "Unable to post to Pinterest". It's been happening all day, over and over again.

I already reconnected my Pinterest account to Buffer. Made zero difference.

The weird part is Buffer's status page says everything is operational while I have a whole inbox full of failed post notifications.

Is anyone else seeing this right now? Trying to figure out if this is a Buffer issue, Pinterest API issue, or something account-specific.

I decided to try netcup and ordered an RS 1000 G12 in Vienna.

The server was basically unusable from the start.

On a clean default Debian installation it scored:

290 single-core / 952 multi-core

I repeated the test:

293 / 940

Then I booted netcup’s own Rescue System to completely exclude my OS and configuration:

296 / 959

Result: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18681662

At first I wondered whether this was somehow normal for their RS 1000 plan, so I ordered a second identical RS 1000 G12 in the same Vienna location.

The second server scored:

1801 single-core / 5751 multi-core

Result: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/18686172

The storage performance was also around 4–5 times better on the second server.

So the first server was not “a little slower”. It was clearly broken, throttled or incorrectly provisioned.

I sent netcup all of this information and asked them to cancel and refund only the defective server.

Then they ignored me for five days.

When they finally replied, they sent me a generic form asking for:

• the affected server
• the plan
• the operating system
• the benchmark used
• the benchmark results
• whether the issue was continuous

Literally all of that was already included in my original message.

At this point I had already rented a second server, tested it, installed everything and migrated my services. I basically diagnosed and solved their infrastructure problem myself while their support stayed silent.

Their servers may offer good price/performance when you receive a normal one, but this support experience is ridiculous.

Has anyone else had netcup deliver a severely underperforming RS and then take days to respond?