u/EmbarrassedHunt6930

Why?

Why not and why yes

Is it predictive or descriptive? State your premises.

Typology as a whole

General question. Insert text

I know I'm biased and I've listened......never posting 12 times in the same minute. I'm just lowkey curious though🫣...

If two experts use the same system and the same data but arrive at different types, is the flaw in the experts or the systems definitions?

What is your burden of proof for a typology claim? Do you prioritize the system's internal logic? Honestly just anything.

I mean like, how do you know someone or anyone at all is a type? Let's say you don't relate to any descriptions of any types in a system but you relate to one description of a type in that system only. Does that make you that still make you that type?

Nothing here, just curious. I would like to fully know other people's stances though.

Nothing here, just curious. (I'm definitely gonna get killed, I've been posting too much here)

Recently, it has come to my attention that correlations supposedly exists for the sole purpose of maintaining constraints, in which, i do wonder.. what are constraints in typology? Were correlation contraints essential from the start?

I'm specifically neutral, but i do strive for hearing others out when they have an opinion. As a community, it's not fair when either sides gets dismissed and bombed with whataboutism, so what is it about Anti-Correlationists that make them so "disliked"? Is it insecurity over typology? Is it insecurity over your stance? Is it insecurity over your ego?

Please let me know.

So I've noticed we have, as a community all collectively agreed strict correlations are just incorrect.

So I'm willing to hear perspectives of those who believes in correlations and what would make you change your mind and disagreeing with correlations/contradictions instead.

I've seen alot of odd hypotheses for types conflicting or being impossible but it goes in the lines along with, "ILI is impossible for sp7. ILI is known to being more biased to it's own logic. Sp7 however is more carefree and more flexible to possibilities. It's impossible"

Maybe it's just me but i feel like beginners are the only one interacting with correlations at this time and moment.

I would honestly be super duper enthusiastic if every strict correlationists in the world will come to me and express their opinion because i love hearing other people's perspective. But yes, I'm not here to debate but to merely hear your arguments.

What do you think?

I don't mean to sound slow, i am a neutral to correlations but I don't see any other reason to call a type impossible rather than making an excuse to violate the fundamental physical law to call it impossible or just cherry pick descriptions and say surface level traits manifests in a way that we don't know so its impossible.

Im curious about what you think🤔❤️