![Image 1 — [Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.](https://preview.redd.it/fo2m0kw5myih1.png?width=1643&format=png&auto=webp&s=0c2c9c57281c3f88758cbed00d504a6785343cb7)
![Image 2 — [Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.](https://preview.redd.it/2ezh8rw5myih1.png?width=1643&format=png&auto=webp&s=7902d0d4e4daea813d52aebd09b1dc6e1af51bd6)
![Image 3 — [Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.](https://preview.redd.it/kjy94ow5myih1.png?width=1643&format=png&auto=webp&s=54ea9c4edd89c7784ba059038bbe37f8a6e18e9f)
![Image 4 — [Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.](https://preview.redd.it/a3q06lw5myih1.png?width=1643&format=png&auto=webp&s=2cc1d9f5e1f1826101dbf5d31948e0eb5635c869)
![Image 5 — [Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.](https://preview.redd.it/8xuzwrw5myih1.png?width=1643&format=png&auto=webp&s=bdd98c906b7378f684c8bcd7abb9c1972487753c)
[Off-season OC] I’ve built a Canadian Hockey Pyramid loosely based on the Swedish system.
First a disclaimer: This is just something I’ve done for fun. I don’t think this is anything Canadian hockey can or should do, and I’m not proposing replacing the current system. It’s a (probably quite bad) attempt at approximating an alternate reality just for my own entertainment, nothing more. Just another off-season thought experiment.
I decided to put together an outline of what a Canadian league pyramid could have looked like if Canadian hockey in the early days had not gone the franchise direction, but instead had been made up of independent (and potentially member owned) grassroots clubs like we have here in Sweden. I created four tiers and filled them with existing (and some former) pro and junior teams (I also changed the names of some similarly named teams) and tried to create a somewhat balanced and geographically reasonable structure. In this thought experiment, all teams are senior though, and most probably have junior teams and kids teams within the club where they foster their own talent. I have not taken any economic aspects (markets etc) into account as I imagine it would play less of a role in this reality and also be self-correcting rather than centrally controlled. I have probably also put a few too many small-town teams high up in the system, but it is something that could happen in an open system, and I didn’t want to make up a bunch of teams.
As opposed to our strict (and in my mind too restrictive) 1-up-1-down system in Sweden, I decided to go with a fairly permeable pyramid in the higher divisions (several teams get the chance to be promoted every season) with a mix of guaranteed promotion and interdivisional qualifiers. From Swedish experience, the interdivisional matchups are always great as the better team on paper has a lot to lose while the up-and-coming team is really fired up. I also decided to use the 3-point system for the regular season and that you have to play playoffs to be promoted. Hockey is a playoff sport, so no direct promotion from the regular season.
I let Copilot simulate this upcoming season (the only AI use but for the playoff tree graphics btw, the rest is my brain and manual Paint labour) in this alternate reality so that you more easily can visualize all the half convoluted qualifying mechanisms I’ve come up with. I do love convoluted qualifying mechanics, but they're also somwhat necessary when combining playoffs and several pro/rel spots up for grabs.
I know there are issues, like implementing all the scheduling in the postseason so teams don’t have to wait too long for their opponents in the other divisions for instance. But I reiterate, it’s a loose though experiment (that took a lot of time to complete). Thoughts?