u/Enough-Future-5394

I know the conclusion could have been better and I know a point or two may look a bit offtrack but What about the rest? What about the structuring ? Positive and negatives of state paternalism?

How else do you think it can be structured?

Does it lack ethical dilemmas in argument?

What is wrong with my answer???

AI scored it 2.5? Why? What have I done wrong?

I have mentioned the themes of utilitarianism.

I have added a diagram for visual understanding.

As subheading in argument I have precisely mentioned the issue and with example I have been elaborate for better understanding.

I see there is no conclusion because the preponderance part already addresses the limitations or way forward things so I couldn't think of conclusion also I crossed the word limit with all those argument and examples.

So what is wrong with my answer?

Another day another try.

Couldn't think of conclusion.

Tried to incorporate some suggestions.

Do review.

Edited: before anybody else review let me give my analysis. I can see I missed anti paper 'leak' bill. In limitation - 1st point could have been expanded for better presentation and 1st and 4th points sounds same. 'therefore strengthening whistleblower protection required ' poor statement bcoz of distorted thought.

Forgot to add the question.

Here is the question -

Applying rules uniformly across unequal socio-economic population can inadvertently perpetuate exclusion. How can a public servant execute governance while ensuring substantive equality for weaker section?

Another day , another try at writing better answers.

Please review and suggest improvement.

Thank you