




Some other size comparisons for dragon Loki
pretty much approximative sizes but roughly accurate, except for Wano scale which seems too much smaller compared to Zunesha.
If you zoom closely you can see some tiny Luffys and Zoros





pretty much approximative sizes but roughly accurate, except for Wano scale which seems too much smaller compared to Zunesha.
If you zoom closely you can see some tiny Luffys and Zoros
I'm not gonna lie, I'm really appreciating seeing him fighting. He's totally living up to the expectations we had on him, of an untouchable god-monster who seems unbeatable by any means.
And I say that because not only he seems impossible to damage. We see that his omen defense is nearly unbreakable, but also hit with a straight ragnir hit in the face + thorheim, he's just having a small drop of blood in his forehead. He's literally undestructible like Kaido but on a much larger scale AND he also goes for the kill instantly like Shanks!! him using omen and acoc even on small fries shows that he's a goddamn predator that doesn't waste time like the other tanks we saw.
It's crazy that he has stronger haki than Shanks, has stronger durability than Kaido, stronger hax than Luffy and yet he'll instantly destroy you before you can even notice.
He truly is the god of One piece. I am really satisfied of seeing him in action, idk why some people are disappointed
Stat scaling has always been mocked in this sub, "but haki trascends all nyanyanyaa" and they always said that it doesn't matter in the slightest in the Shanks vs Kaido debate, but somehow, since literally day 1 before Loki even started getting some feats, people switched up saying that Loki powercliffed Kaido because he's an ancient giant with legendary zoan so he has better stats than him.
That's not an agenda post, I'm genuinely wondering what's the logic passage here, make it make sense pls