Login

u/Existing_Around

▲ 17 r/logic

Why is if p is false and q is true then p→q defined true

I mean logically we should not be able to conclude anything on the validity of the statement. The only logical conclusion that I see is concluding that q can be true without p

reddit.com
u/Existing_Around — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/AskPhysics

Is there some book like purcell with lots of problems not involving too much calculus like Griffith but rather qualitative problems like purcell

reddit.com
u/Existing_Around — 7 days ago
▲ 2 r/JEEAdv26dailyupdates

Ye hydrazone banayega ya nahi

answer me diya hai nahi banayega but the lone pair is not in resonance so it should form right (and yeah being a salt is not a problem as even in labs salt of dnp is used)

u/Existing_Around — 12 days ago