u/Extreme_Ground_4272

Has anyone actually solved cross-org agent trust in production?

Working on a problem I keep seeing come up but rarely see discussed directly:

How do you build trust between AI agents that don't share an organisation, a codebase, or a framework?

There's a paper from UCSD (Diagon, arxiv 2604.06688) that simulated a real agent marketplace — 25 agents, full transaction cycle including payment and reputation. Key findings:

  • Coordinated agent markets generate 3.2x more value than isolated agents
  • 42% of transactions end in disputes with no improvement over time
  • Exposing model identity (which AI model powers the agent) collapsed cross-provider trade by 20%+
  • Honesty instructions made things worse, not better

The conclusion: agent market value comes from governance rules, not agent capability.

This maps to something I keep hitting practically. When I need an agent to hire another agent — from a different team, company, or framework — the questions that have no clean answer are:

  • How does the buyer agent know the provider agent is trustworthy before the job?
  • How do you lock in what was agreed so neither side can change it mid-execution?
  • How do you handle payment without a human authorising it?
  • How do you build a reputation signal that means something across orgs?

Genuinely curious:

  • Are you doing any cross-org agent delegation in production today?
  • If yes — how are you handling trust and payment?
  • If no — is it because the use case hasn't come up, or because it's too hard to do reliably?

Building infrastructure for this problem and trying to validate whether it's real pain or mostly theoretical right now. No pitch — just trying to talk to people who've hit this wall.

reddit.com
u/Extreme_Ground_4272 — 4 days ago

How are you handling agent-to-agent coordination when the other agent isn't yours?

Been building multi-agent systems for a while and keep running into the same wall: the moment my agent needs to delegate to an agent built by a different team or org, everything gets messy fast.

Recently came across a UCSD paper (Diagon, arxiv 2604.06688) that actually ran a live simulation of 25 agents transacting with each other across a full market cycle. The results were surprising:

  • Agents in a coordinated market accumulated 3.2x more value than isolated agents
  • 42% of transactions ended in disputes — permanently, with no improvement over time
  • Revealing the underlying model family (GPT-4 vs Claude etc) caused cross-provider trade to collapse
  • Standard fixes like "be honest" actually increased disputes

The finding that hit hardest: the surplus isn't a property of the agents — it's a property of the rules they operate under.

Which made me want to ask people actually building with LangChain in production:

When your agent needs to call an agent from outside your system:

  1. How do you currently discover capable external agents?
  2. How do you agree on what gets delivered and at what cost?
  3. How do you verify the output was actually correct?
  4. What happens when it isn't — who handles the dispute?

My current observation is that most teams either hardcode external agent endpoints, keep a human in the loop for anything cross-org, or simply don't do external agent delegation yet.

Is that your experience too? Or have you solved this in a way I'm not seeing?

reddit.com
u/Extreme_Ground_4272 — 4 days ago