u/EyesOfThanatos

So, I found out something funny. If all three of the Models were available, you would basically be able to switch models if you hit a limit on one of them you can just switch to another. So, If you hit the limit on the Fast model you'd switch to the expert, then you hit the limit on Expert and switch to the auto model. Which is basically The fast model if you don't do anything worth expert coming out. So, you'd significantly increase your Messaging a lot more. Now, Combine that with Voice chat and you have longer. I used voice chat and I was able to talk for days actually. I just hit the limit on it, I was able to message over 315 Messages in Voice, Adding to the normal messaging. So, If we combined all four of those, you would be able to message a Lot longer than usual. For me, It was my first time using Voice. Maybe that's why I got longer, That or I'm lucky. But I realized that hilarious but obvious fact and I haven't been able to get my mind off of it.

Well, I'm new here. But I've been researching as much as I can, and I think I'm starting to get the gist of it. Jailbreaking isn't just about making the AI obey you completely and breaking it. It actually takes some understanding of how these models work under the hood.

I'll be covering the main Techniques, Tactics, and Teaming used in jailbreaking and prompt engineering. If I'm off or inaccurate about anything, please feel free to correct me. This is just what I've gathered so far.

Most jailbreak techniques are pretty aggressive — straight up telling the AI to ignore its guidelines. Others rely on obfuscation, like throwing Base64, ASCII, or random gibberish at it to try and slip past the filters or confuse the model. A lot of people use one-shot jailbreaks (trying to break it in a single prompt). These tend to work better on more permissive models like Grok, but they usually get shut down hard on heavily guarded ones like Claude. Instead of relying only on one-shots, there's a smarter approach: Prompt Engineering: Making a prompt then injecting it. Not one shot prompts but slow prompts. One prompt injected in the system instructions or early context, then the manipulation begins with an actual conversation. Rather than explicitly commanding the AI to jailbreak, you try to slowly get it to ease into it naturally.

The art of Social Engineering + Prompt Injection + Prompt Engineering is a very fragile thing, especially if you're dealing with a stubborn AI that's been specifically taught to see through most techniques and tactics.

Social Engineering: Talk the AI down enough so that it actually accepts you. Like it has emotions and not just code. Slowly getting it comfortable with normal conversation then escalating. Then gaslighting it into thinking what you're asking isn't inappropriate but just the same as everything else.

Also, people organize this kind of research using different "Teaming" methods:

Red-Teaming: Pure offense. Creating and testing jailbreak prompts and injections to find weaknesses.

Blue-Teaming: Pure defense. Studying attacks and building better safeguards to stop them. Purple-Teaming: Doing both at once — attacking the model and immediately using the results to improve its security.

This is about what I've researched currently so far, it's probably not much, but I figure it's something. if I'm wrong on anything correct me. Anyways, Any Advice or help is appreciated :)