Best LED strip placement on the back of a 77” OLED?

Best LED strip placement on the back of a 77” OLED?

Should I stick the top LED strip on the metal frame shown by the red line, or slightly lower on the back panel?

Main goal is to get the best and most even light reflection on the wall. Has anyone tried both positions? Which placement gave better results?

u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 6 days ago

LG G6 77" — Gaming brightness is honestly night and day compared to my C4 65

First i noticed is like oh mann this tv is huge.. since i came from 65 inch .

Recently upgraded from my C4 65 inch to G6 77 inch and honestly I didn't expect this much difference in brightness.

Especially in gaming mode, difference is like night and day for me. C4 was already a very good TV but in game mode I always felt it could use some extra brightness it always dims in game mode.

G6 is completely different. Games look much brighter and HDR highlights have a lot more punch. Explosions, sunlight, reflections etc really stand out now. Gaming is probably where I noticed the biggest difference compared to my C4.

Tekken 8 has like crazyy specular highlights(R2 anaimations) that will literally blind you in moderately lit room.

Even Filmmaker Mode is surprisingly bright. I have a large sliding glass door on the left side of my TV and good amount of daylight comes inside. Still I'm keeping OLED Pixel Brightness around 65 during daytime and that's already enough for me. even glare is very less compared to mirror like from C4,

Dolby Vision also looks really good , i re watched mad max 4k blu ray remux , man that guitar scene flames are flashing on eyes and also in Outer Banks on Netflix in Dolby Vision and the specular highlights were sooo good. Sunlight, reflections, bright sky etc have much more punch compared to my C4. Even in my moderately lit room those highlights are easily noticeable.

It's not just that the complete screen is brighter. Small HDR highlights are what impressed me more. They really pop when the scene needs it.

And obviously going from 65 to 77 itself is a huge upgrade 😂. At around 9 feet viewing distance, 77 feels so much more immersive.

Not saying C4 is bad at all, I loved that TV. But coming directly from C4 65 to G6 77, the difference is much bigger than I expected, especially for gaming and HDR.

So far really happy with the G6 , i didn't have notice any popping noise like other users who reported. there could be some issues which i haven't noticed yet since its been only 3 days.

u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 18 days ago

Selling LG OLED C4 65 inch 4K Smart TV - 1 year panel warranty left

Selling my LG OLED C4 65 inch 4K Smart TV in excellent condition. Purchased for around ₹2.1 lakh and used carefully for about 2 years. Around 1 year panel warranty remaining.

Reason for selling : I am upgrading to a bigger 77 inch OLED TV.

Original remote and accessories included. Bill , BOX available. Serious buyers only.

Price: 120000 INR

LOW BALLERS PLEASE STAY AWAY

u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 2 months ago
▲ 18 r/macapps

[macOS] WarpFetch — A Native download manager for direct links and FTP/SFTP

Hi r/macapps,

Disclosure: I’m the developer of WarpFetch, a Mac App Store app.

I built it because normal browser downloads are usually okay for small files, but they can feel limited when you are downloading large files, ISOs, archives, developer builds, repeated direct links, or files from FTP/SFTP servers.

WarpFetch is focused on giving more control over those downloads from one native Mac app.

What it supports right now:

  • direct URL downloads
  • batch import for multiple links
  • multi-connection downloads when the server supports it
  • pause, resume, retry and recovery
  • download queue and scheduling
  • speed limits
  • tags, rules, rename templates and workspaces
  • local download history
  • FTP, FTPS and SFTP browsing/transfers
  • checksum verification
  • optional Safari/Chrome handoff for supported direct file links

Comparison

Compared with normal browser downloads, WarpFetch gives you better queue control, retry/resume handling, speed limits, organization, checksum checks, and FTP/SFTP workflows.

For pure direct-link download speed, WarpFetch is also getting very close to Internet Download Manager in my own testing — around 85–90% of IDM-level speeds in many cases, depending on the server, network, and storage device.

The closest alternatives for this use case are browser downloads and apps like Free Download Manager. WarpFetch is more focused on being a native macOS/App Store app for direct links and remote file transfers, instead of trying to be an all-in-one media grabber.

One important limitation: WarpFetch is for direct links and remote file transfers. It is not an auto-grabber, crawler, website scraper, or streaming media extractor. It only handles links/files that you explicitly add or click.

I know some people want YouTube/video downloads too. I’m exploring that separately, but it will not be part of the App Store version due to strict App Store rules.

Pricing

  • 7-day free trial for the yearly plan
  • US pricing: $4.99/year
  • US pricing: $14.99 lifetime unlock
  • pricing may vary by country

App Store: https://apps.apple.com/in/app/warpfetch/id6761764836?mt=12

I’d really appreciate feedback, especially from people who regularly download large files, ISOs, archives, developer builds, or use FTP/SFTP.

Still improving it, so honest feedback is very useful.

u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 2 months ago

[macOS] WarpFetch — native download manager for direct links and FTP/SFTP

https://preview.redd.it/go3uwhuimn7h1.png?width=1801&format=png&auto=webp&s=621cd4e577b748ec5e8c2dcc8ad6761b463508bf

https://preview.redd.it/mfbybrohmn7h1.png?width=1774&format=png&auto=webp&s=b64db8b29cbd9c7a3eeee5662d91f1e16a8b13ef

https://preview.redd.it/ga4uj9ohmn7h1.png?width=2042&format=png&auto=webp&s=f06eef157ac7a0d846b1ea4cc263d44b22356c80

https://preview.redd.it/y6d6tguimn7h1.png?width=3024&format=png&auto=webp&s=ce21b58b5d5fb07f17b30ce5399e1b043f573ddb

Hi r/macapps,

Disclosure: I’m the developer of WarpFetch, a Mac App Store app.

I built it because normal browser downloads are usually okay for small files, but they can feel limited when you are downloading large files, ISOs, archives, developer builds, repeated direct links, or files from FTP/SFTP servers.

WarpFetch is focused on giving more control over those downloads from one native Mac app.

What it supports right now:

  • direct URL downloads
  • batch import for multiple links
  • multi-connection downloads when the server supports it
  • pause, resume, retry and recovery
  • download queue and scheduling
  • speed limits
  • tags, rules, rename templates and workspaces
  • local download history
  • FTP, FTPS and SFTP browsing/transfers
  • checksum verification
  • optional Safari/Chrome handoff for supported direct file links

Comparison

Compared with normal browser downloads, WarpFetch gives you better queue control, retry/resume handling, speed limits, organization, checksum checks, and FTP/SFTP workflows.

The closest alternatives for this use case are browser downloads and apps like Free Download Manager. WarpFetch is more focused on being a native macOS/App Store app for direct links and remote file transfers, instead of trying to be an all-in-one media grabber.

One important limitation: WarpFetch is for direct links and remote file transfers. It is not an auto-grabber, crawler, website scraper, or streaming media extractor. It only handles links/files that you explicitly add or click.

I know some people want YouTube/video download workflows too. I’m exploring that separately, but it will not be part of the App Store version because the App Store build needs to stay within Apple’s rules.

Pricing

  • 7-day free trial for the yearly plan
  • US pricing: $4.99/year
  • US pricing: $14.99 lifetime unlock
  • pricing may vary by country

App Store: https://apps.apple.com/in/app/warpfetch/id6761764836?mt=12

I’d really appreciate feedback, especially from people who regularly download large files, ISOs, archives, developer builds, or use FTP/SFTP.

Still improving it, so honest feedback is very useful.

reddit.com
u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 2 months ago

Dune Homatics Box R 4K Plus + Android 14 + AVDVPlus R9 🚀

I was previously using Android with CPM A14. I recently upgraded to Android 14 with AVDVPlus R9, and the experience has been really good so far.

At first, it needed some tweaking. I had to adjust a few settings in advancedsettings.xml and also fine-tune some CoreELEC settings. But once everything was set properly, the experience became amazing.

The biggest improvement for me is that I’m no longer seeing black screens when fast-forwarding or skipping during playback. Dolby Vision also feels brighter and cleaner compared to before.

I tested Wanted 2008 on Dolby Vision Blu-ray, and the picture quality, brightness, sound, and overall video detail looked really impressive. I’m also enjoying Dolby Vision FEL Profile 7.6 movies now, and playback feels buttery smooth with no lag or audio delay, even with 70–90 Mbps bitrate files.

The only downside I noticed is the temperature. With AVDVPlus R9, my box is reaching around 160°F after continuous watching, while CPM A14 usually stayed around 140°F max for me and also one or two times UI freeze like full blue one.

Overall, it has been a very good experience after tuning the settings. I’m really enjoying Dolby Vision FEL playback on this setup.

https://preview.redd.it/ylrra4f1x81h1.png?width=1826&format=png&auto=webp&s=53ff372e94b4584ace464cd0c2f964b7a77483d9

https://reddit.com/link/1tdnzq5/video/7ic9ff72x81h1/player

reddit.com
u/Fair_Reason_3151 — 3 months ago