u/FallenAngelINC1913

This dude should get up from his grave and kick his son because of disobedience. EVM speaks a lot about obedience but he is an example of a stubborn child.

There are actually a lot of "worldwide thingy offerings" nowadays. EVM is on a spending spree to build many temples without even looking at the finances of the church. He is launching projects and donation drives to give members financial burden just to give himself glory for his achievements. Even when the members are incapable, EVM instills in them to give abundantly even during poverty. This is where corruption thrives.

But it's actually a wake up call and an eye opener so that people would realize that this cult is a scam from the start. What the two previous executive ministers were hiding were exposed by EVM and made their cultic activities obvious.

Ask any INC and you'll be surprised. They can't even give you a Lamsa Bible Translation. Most probably they'll give you a bunch of Pasugo Toilet Papers. I can't even call INC as a Christian organization just for this reason.

Rarity of things that you'll see in an INC home:

Super Common - INC flags and paraphernalia

Common - Manalo clan portraits

Epic - 10 Commandments for INC's

Super Rare/Extinct - Holy Bible

Seriously, it's more like "Training Ground: for Manalo's 4ss lickers".

Probably also how to manipulate people and show their sheep clothing (how to speak loudly, cry-pray, and lure gullible people) in order to increase membership and finally create additional offerings.

What I hear during lectures, their adlibs would usually comprise of venerating Manalo or things about propagation and increasing offerings.

They can't do critical thinking, can't even answer doctrinal questions on the spot, can't see them perform debates and defend their faith but now obliged to ignore things on social media. I haven't seen any strong minister that proudly represents INC and defend them against their enemies valiantly on TV or online. Most are scripted and they couldn't be questioned live. They can't move even their foot and mouth without Manalo's authorization.

But what we can see trending on TV / online and on rallies is that Manalo sends ministers to speak to the government and low-key defend corrupt politicians.

There was no Felix Manalo in the Bible, so it was his interpretation.

There was no World War 1 in the Bible, so it was his interpretation.

There was no July 27, 1914 in the Bible, so it was his interpretation

There was no Big 4 in the Bible, so it was his interpretation.

There was no Philippines in the Bible, so it was his interpretation

Why the name change from INK to INC? If Felix Manalo was so sure of the name of his "true" church, why change it? Does the true church use a "K" or "C"?

Probably he realized that using INK has less appeal, and he could use the initials INC to attract more members to join his group (another INC which was established in 1901 and more popular during the time) just as a trick.

Or for some shallow reasons, such as: avoiding the ridicule of calling them "paint" (ink) / Ayaw lang nilang tuksuhin silang mga "tinta" (ink).

INC wants to put their ideology first over accuracy. They are doing analysis paralysis. They will not believe exactly what is written because it contradicts their belief, which is a dangerous thing. They will look for interpretations and translations that will fit their narratives.

Specifically, in Acts 20:28, the INC was looking for answers in different directions, while ignoring the author or the writer of the text, his language, and to whom he was talking to. How could a writer who speaks fluently in Koine Greek, write in Aramaic? Even the Apostle Paul speaks in Koine Greek and in this verse, he was speaking in front of Greek audiences in Miletus and Ephesus. This means that the INC’s claim that Aramaic was the correct translation is highly questionable. Manuscripts for Acts written in Koine Greek (Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus) don’t need to be translated and thus would be more accurate.

Though there were ancient copies of the New Testament in different dialects of Aramaic, these dialects cannot exactly be considered “Jesus’ mother tongue,” (a usual defense by the INC) because they changed considerably over time and varied significantly from place to place. These versions are usually called the “Syriac,” which is one of the most widely used and well-documented dialects of Aramaic. While these Aramaic New Testament versions were made already in antiquity, the scholarly consensus is clear that they were translations, mostly from the Greek, into later Aramaic dialects. They were not original Aramaic versions of the New Testament books. The fact that even the earliest Syriac translators had to rely on Greek manuscripts is a good indication that Hebrew or Aramaic copies of the New Testament were unavailable already in the early centuries AD. The manuscript tradition thus strongly indicates a Greek origin for all the books of the New Testament.

Why doesn't the INC want to follow what is written in the Greek Acts 20:28? Because it will melt down their initial and core belief that their official church name (INC) was the one purchased by the blood of Christ. Their ideology and prophetic claims would shatter and turn to dust.

As the vision in the Apocalypse presents the picture, the “four angels” appear before the “other angel”. Manalo’s identification of the angels does not correspond with this order of appearance. Manalo the “other angel” began his preaching and has his church established in 1914.

Whereas, of his “four angels”, three, Orlando (1917), Clemenceau (1917) and Lloyd George (1916) only became premiers of their respective countries in 1916 or after.

And the holding of the four winds (bringing about peace at the four corners of the world) as Manalo interpreted happened later in 1919.

Though this is a really boring WS, be aware, listen and observe their lies, the minister who will facilitate the coming worship lectures won’t start with Revelations 7:1, but instead, he will proceed with the “other angel” verse in Revelations 7:2 to give the impression that Felix Manalo came first before the Big 4.

To counter criticism, the minister will say that the "other angel" was already ascending (preaching) when the Big 4 came in verse 2, but it will backfire because of their claim that the "other angel" appeared in 1914. It is really hard to prove something which is not true.

What I agree on the other hand is that Manalo is a Big liar.

Rejected.

The word “Doxology” is nowhere to be found in the Bible, but the INC uses it in each of their rituals. Instead, “The Doxology” was a title of a hymn stanza written by Thomas Ken, a bishop in the Church of England around 1674 to close worship services. It is recognized as a fundamental expression of Trinity theology. Thomas Ken’s theology was firmly rooted in traditional orthodox Anglicanism, which holds to the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds (which detail the Trinity). The word Doxology originated from the Medieval Latin doxologia, derived from Ancient Greek doxologia ("praise, glory"). It combines doxa ("glory, praise," from dokein "to seem") and -logia ("saying, speaking"). It literally translates to "a speaking of glory" or "words of glory" or “words of praise”.

However, the Doxology of the INC should not be titled as such because the version of INC only praises the Father but does not praise the Son and the Holy Spirit unlike the original hymn by Thomas Ken. The INC wanted to move away from the concept of Trinity that gives equal praise for the three entities. If you can recall the old version by the INC, it was a praise to the Father but unclear if it is also dedicated to the Son and Holy Spirit. The new INC hymn removes that ambiguity and removes the praise from the two. The INC denies that their Doxology confess their belief in the Trinity, but whatever rejection they have, the fact remains that the origin of their Doxology was copied not from the Bible but from their rival Protestants who believe in the Trinity.

Kapag bumoto ka dahil sa pasiya ng iba, para kang Makapili na ibinenta ang sariling bayan para sa dayuhan.

Their reasoning about the messenger is a vicious cycle. And they use the words of Paul as if it is Manalo's words just to make FYM look like a hero.

Tinatanong pa ba iyan, kita ninyo naman ang yaman ng INC ni Manalo at take note, walang tax lahat iyan, double jeopardy sa bansa natin.