u/Famous_Cell4481

So shakti is just an appearance and shakti is not the ground of being, so it's useless to worship her and consider her half of shiv, and how does dualities cease to exist after mahasamadhi if the ground of being or being itself ( shiv ) exists and is different from shakti, and if it's not different from shakti then why don't we reborn or why don't we experiance being as shakti even after enlightened mahasamadhi.

Why is immanence associated with femininity and transcendence associated with masculinity?

Why is awareness, conscouness, and the beyond associated with masculinity and the the material, matrix, illusion, ignorance , worldly rebirth associated with femininity ( these r pretty popular and problematic spiritual concepts )

I personally think these shouldn't be used and new terms should be made for describing god.

Have u noticed in almost every religious - spiritual combined traditions

It's either God - man ( his image and lower ) - woman

Or either it's man ( Transcendental) - woman ( form of the transcendental)

I think masculine terms shouldnt be used for describing awareness, it's incredibly mysoginist that awareness is called masculine , there r no scientific evidence of pure awareness , and consciousness being mascline .

Infact sky dad and earth mom is also very mysoginist, why is the expansive, vast and above part is masculine ? And why is the changeable earthly part is feminine ?

Solar and lunar symbolisms r also incredibly mysoginist, why is the full, sovereign part and say is assocyaed with masculinity, and moon which has no light of its own and borrows light from sun associated with femininity .