u/Fast-Task-uk

I found a study showing that the same AI-generated text is judged differently depending on whether it is labeled as AI-written or human-written, affecting measures such as perceived credibility.
I’m wondering whether there are any published studies that have tested a similar effect for judgments of subjective experience.
For example, participants would first read anonymous passages describing experiences or internal states and rate whether they seem subjective or experiential. They would then be told whether each passage was written by a human or an AI to see whether knowledge of the source changes those ratings.
Has anything like this already been studied? If so, I’d really appreciate references to the relevant papers.

I’m looking for empirical research rather than opinions.
I found a study showing that the same AI-generated text is judged differently depending on whether it is labeled as AI-written or human-written, affecting measures such as perceived credibility.
I’m wondering whether there are any published studies that have tested a similar effect for judgments of subjective experience.
For example, participants would first read anonymous passages describing experiences or internal states and rate whether they seem subjective or experiential. They would then be told whether each passage was written by a human or an AI to see whether knowledge of the source changes those ratings.
Has anything like this already been studied? If so, I’d really appreciate references to the relevant papers.