Having reviewed the evidence:

• Historical summaries successfully processed 9,000+ token conversations.
• Manual Memory accepts vastly larger entries.
• Current proxy summaries terminate at different points, ruling against a consistent hidden word/token cutoff.
• Proxy generation fails during Thoughts, before reaching the final answer.
• Janitor's own LLM independently exhibits a separate failure: Thoughts are written into Memory instead of the actual summary.
• Ordinary chat generation remains functional.
• The malfunction appeared after recent changes to the site.

VERDICT

The Court finds the Janitor AI Summary/Memory system GUILTY of an apparent regression/bug.

The prosecution has not established a secret summary token limit.

The defense has provided no convincing evidence that the historical behavior was intentionally replaced with a fixed restriction.

The precise technical cause remains unknown.

FINAL RULING

>

Not your model.

Not your 1M context.

Not your proxy.

Not Max Tokens = 0.

Not the Memory field.

The damn machinery behind the feature is tweaking.

Case: The People vs. Janitor AI Memory

Verdict: BUG.

Sentence: Explain yourself to the users.