When Miguel is explaining canon events to Miles, specifically the scene of the universe being destroyed, Miguel says “Isn’t that right Peter”, and Peter nods and says “Yeah” in a guilty voice. Is there a reason he singles out Peter or is there something I’m not getting?
Title explains it. We have a bunch of wool colors in the game, so why are the new abandoned tents only white? They should be different colors! It would add a bunch more variety to the structures and overall make them look nicer.
hey!
recently, my hard drive broke and I had to get a new one, resulting in all my pc files disappearing. I have my steam account back on my pc, but my ror2 progress is wiped (assuming because the files are gone). but on steam, I still have my play time and achievements, so it’s kind of weird. is there a way to recover my save, maybe by syncing my achievements to my progress or something?
was watching the trailer for LotF2 and THAT IS LITERALLY AVIZANDUM HBRO
I know that’s a crazy claim, but hear me out. GTA 6 WILL look more realistic and detailed, but if you compared RDR 2 and GTA 6, RDR 2 will fool more people into thinking it’s real life.
I think this is to do with art styles. The graphics of GTA 6 are better in every way, but the art style is different. GTA 6’s art style is the 80’s, with colorful neon vibes and Miami feeling (obviously). RDR 2’s art style IS real life. Everything they did with lightning, terrain, etc. is to make it look like real life.
I do want to say, I think the art style GTA 6 is doing will end up looking better and matching the vibe. I just wanted to write this to talk about how RDR 2 will probably always be the game that looks closest to real life, why would games want to look like the real world when they can make the lighting and world even better.
So I know it sounds stupid at first, but I think RDR 2 looks more like real life than GTA6, and that there is a different between real life, and realistic.