Bruce Springsteen fan - help me!!
Hey!!
I absolutely love Mumford & Sons. I've been to two of their concerts and they were amazing. But when they ended, they just felt so short.
I blame Bruce. I've been to 10 Springsteen concerts, all around 2h45–3h long, and I know he used to play even longer... Up to 4h!!!
The funny thing is, I probably now love Mumford's songs even more than Bruce's these days. But when it comes to the live experience, how can I not compare?
I know that quantity doesn't automatically mean quality, and I'm not saying every band should play for three or four hours. But Mumford & Sons are playing stadiums now in the US. Why not stretch the show a little? Even another 20–30 minutes would make a big difference.
Is there a reason they seem to cap their shows always around 1h50? I'd genuinely love to understand.
Thanks!