On Revelation 1:1–3: If Shincheonji misinterprets and misteaches even the first three verses of Revelation, can the rest of it be true?
Rev. 1.1-3:
1 The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, 2 who testifies to everything he saw – that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. 3 Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.
—————————-
SCJ really take any verse and twist it until it fits their own doctrine. But that doesn’t mean for a moment that it’s the truth!
I wonder why SCJ interprets “every“ verse of this Revelation as a prophecy referring to their Promised Shepherd and their church.
Nowhere in the whole Bible do you find this kind of interpretation. Not even in the Old Testament.
Even in the prophetic books, there is a historical section which, for example, describes a specific event Or it serves as an introduction to a book. There is no need to force this event to fit the fulfilment of a prophecy.
Verses 1–3 of Revelation 1 contain not a single word referring to Shincheonji or to a Promised Shepherd.
This concerns the revelation of Jesus Christ, which an angel showed to John (the Apostle John) in a vision of future events, so that the servants might be informed when these things took place; John then wrote them down.
Why must these verses be dissected and interpreted in such a way that they fit exactly into some doctrine?
Is this not adding to the Revelation?