u/Garbageman96

New road offence

Say a car failed to stop, all occupants de-camp and no visual or cctv of who the driver was. All occupants are caught.

I’ve had a job like this recently where everything was NFA’d because no driver could be identified. Was gutted as the pursuit was so risky, it felt like justice hadn’t been done.

Sorry if there is already a similar offence, but why couldn’t one be created, or like a special warning interview question, where failure to identify who the driver was is a separate offence?

I’m struggling to see any sort of defence they could give? If they say they don’t know the name etc, fine, point him out in the BWV etc.

If they all commit to no comment, they all get charged. I know there is the offence for ‘allowing to be carried’ but this is different. The creation of the offence would be to identify the driver so that it prevents NOTHING happening if the police don’t know who the driver was.

And yes, I realise this isn’t all airtight.

reddit.com
u/Garbageman96 — 4 days ago
▲ 4 r/uklaw

UK judges/magistrate’s v American judges

I have a question. I see videos of US judges and they always seem more animated than our U.K. ones?

US judges seem to be allowed to actually speak their minds where our judges, MAYBE at the end of a big sentencing call the defendant acts ‘cowardly’ or some such.

I’m just wondering why that is. Do US judges get a lot more leeway in what they are allowed to say or act?

reddit.com
u/Garbageman96 — 2 months ago