u/Girlz_First

Hi everyone,

I have a question for all of you. I'm aware that many Gynarchists have a rule preventing them from voting for any male candidate running for public office.

Suppose a male politician intended to establish a Gynarchy by force. Suppose he had raised enough power and influence to actually make it happen. Would any of you support him? Would he be seen as a hero in the eyes of Women?

Would especially love to hear a Woman's perspective.

The following post discusses sex and reproduction. I thought I would add a "Fetish Posting" tag to avoid breaking the Fetish Content Restriction rule.

I had a pleasant interaction with a Female contributor recently who supported the idea of regulating the male population. She proposed capping a society's male population at a ratio of 70:30 or 80:20. This is an idea I've already seen repeated by radical feminists like Sally Miller Gearhart and Mary Daly. It's an interesting idea. What do you guys think?

Naturally, there would be a greater scarcity of men, leading the few that are left to be passed around among Women, similar to what is practiced by the Mosuo people in China. I thought I would propose a sort of voucher system designed to incentivize and reward positive male behavior. I call it the "pink slip" (it could be any color; it doesn't matter) (it could also be digitized). The idea draws inspiration from an early 20th century novel titled "We," written by a Russian science fiction writer named Yevgeny Zamyatin. While the novel was not set in a future Matriarchal society, the pink slip, if implemented, could serve a means to nudge more men to embrace Female supremacy. The way it works is as follows: Women choose to hand a man they accept and find sexually attractive a slip indicating that he is compatible. Those few lucky men may then turn them in at a designated government counter, at which time they will be enrolled for reproduction and "marriage," in the traditional sense. See it as a social credit score. Because the slips are distributed by Women, such a system would theoretically generate a greater degree of Female autonomy. Gone are the days of being approached by random reproductively incompatible male vermin.

Men are said to be more sex-driven. From a psychodynamic approach, the male subconsciously wishes to be engulfed by something higher than himself: the divine Feminine. The pink slip promises men a greater abundance of sex, thereby securing their loyalty and obedience in the long run.

If a man is ever found to have harmed a Woman, he will lose all his credits and be sent immediately to a reeducation facility.

This post is meant to be purely speculative and not a blueprint, though it could be framed as such. Here is something I had been thinking about lately. It is simple to speculate that as science progresses, so too will our abilities to enhance and modify the traits already assigned to each gender, which are generally assumed to be taken as axiomatic or essentialist among Female supremacists. Women are smarter, for example, leading them to be even smarter as science progresses. Will this progression naturally magnify the advantages Women already wield over men? Should societies, then, focus solely on enhancing Female biology, at the expense of enhancing male biology (apart from achieving an equal, baseline level of health for both genders)? I would definitely support this. As a consequence, men would be rendered completely powerless, thereby helping to secure a permanent Gynarchy. I read something interesting about Women and telepathy in another subreddit. Apparently, there is some evidence showing that Women are telepathic to a minor degree. A world where this trait is enhanced and shared exclusively among Women would also be really cool to see. Feel free to share any other thoughts.

Hi again, this is my second post. It seems I have received a fairly warm welcome. To further my initiation into this community, I thought I would explore the topic of male-to-Female etiquette, specifically how we men should address the superior gender. Hopefully your responses will serve as a quick and useful reference for future male redditors joining our community. I feel that addressing this topic is important for a future Gynarchic society. After all, it's important that Women and Girls have their inherently superior value reinforced on a daily basis. We already have formal titles such as "Ma'am," "Miss," or "Madam." These titles, however, may come across as too archaic and no longer age-appropriate, though "Miss" sounds to be more of an enduring title, in my opinion.

On a related note, should we start capitalizing words linked to Women in written language? Words such as Woman, Womanhood, Girl, Girlhood, Femininity, Mother, Female, Matriarchy, and Gynarchy? How do You Women feel about this? Personally, I think it's a nice, subtle way for men to signal their loyalty and respect.

I would like to see men bowing to Women in public, with boys being taught to model this behavior in front of Girls early on at school.

Feel free to throw in any other ideas.

Hi, I'm new here. I'm a male social sciences major and super interested in the study of matriarchies. I'm eager to interact with other female supremacists. To start, how may I add a "male ally" tag below my username? I've seen a number of accounts with it. Is it something that must be earned? I would be proud to showcase it. Another burning question I have is: Is there any news of a female supremacy-themed meetup group being organized?