u/GoodShibe

A member of the Litecoin community is weighing in on the many issues and scandals surrounding The Dogecoin Foundation, House of Doge and more.

A very interesting read!

Something like OpenDyslexic or Lexend?

Thanks!

I've got a decent catalog now that I'm proud of and want to start turning them into high quality music videos. What platform/software do you recommend?

Thanks!

Those who remember Sporklin will remember how fiercely she defended Dogecoin. In fact her biteyness was pretty legendary, in that regard.

And one thing she truly was concerned about was the Dogecoin Foundation trying to take over Dogecoin. She believed in a separation of church and state, so to speak, and that the Foundation should never have any control over the project itself - in retrospect much our own disagreements came from my support of the Foundation back then, I never could see what she did, what she was so concerned about.

As it turns out, her concerns were more than justified because, as it turns out, it wasn't long after her passing that the Dogecoin Foundation began to work toward exactly that goal: taking control of the Dogecoin project.

For years they have been quietly and, recently, less quietly working toward that goal.

Please put your attention on this and what they've been up to.

Much Love,

GS

Hey all,

There’s an ongoing copyright lawsuit involving Doge-related imagery and a crypto project that’s currently active in federal court.

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/new-jersey/njdce/2:2026cv00072/589461

You can download the full 42-page complaint as a PDF here:

https://assets.alm.com/19/8d/58cbebf54723a7c24e22d0735131/doge-v-cocoro-community-project-complaint-u-s-distict-court-for-the-district-of-new-jersey.pdf

Assertions in the lawsuit:

Own The Doge claims that Atsuko Sato (owner of Kabuso) licensed to them:

• The right to "stand in Sato's shoes... register, enforce, defend, and otherwise act as Sato in any commercial or legal matters relating to the licensed materials."

• That the licensing agreement between them grants "...the broadest grant of rights possible under applicable law..." and the right to "stand in Licensor's shoes."

• They claim that Atsuko licensed"...registered or unregistered trademarks, trade names, copyrights, logos, branding and designs... 'now or hereafter known'..." including future pets.

This is incredibly broad language and my concern is that, if accepted by the court, it could be interpreted as giving them broad reach over and including Dogecoin's branding, logo, etc

They further claim:

• "the public has come to identify the Doge Meme and all related intellectual property, including the Cocoro IP, with Plaintiff and its products."

This is why we felt it was worth highlighting to the community at large for discussion.

Thanks,

GS